Thanks!

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 163851763, 163851833, 163852061, 163852132.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163854413 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some French schoolkid vandalism

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163854413 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some French schoolkid vandalism

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163854413 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some French schoolkid vandalism

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163854413 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some French schoolkid vandalism

Hello,
A couple of relations here now have gaps in them, such as relation/3149263#map=17/52.192768/-2.229597 . Do you know where the Three Choirs Way tells people to go if they are going from Worcester to Hereford?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks - I've edited it and it now looks like relation/4026281#map=18/51.308127/-0.614454 - is that OK?

Thanks - they have both reappeared:

10713a10714
> -5986877 | Sleveen East
10725a10727
> -5986752 | Lackaduff
55670c55672
< (55667 rows)
---
> (55669 rows)

Hello - a quick question about the cycle route at relation/4026281#map=18/51.308127/-0.614454 - do you know how it gets from the south bank to the north? There's a gap currently.
Best Regards,
Andy

Oops - I think that the merging of two bits of bridge into way/176962752 has broken a couple of relations - see for example relation/5986877#map=19/51.905440/-8.962245 . I've no idea if this was deliberately merged or just "something that Vespucci did". The "sticky-out bit" means that it is no longer a valid polygon. Would you like to fix that or would you rather that I did?
Best Regards,
Andy

Irrespective of local laws, wuld some sort of "hazard" tag make sense?
I think that there was some sort of discussion of "iffy" crossings on https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/do-we-really-need-railway-tram-crossing-resp-tram-level-crossing/118987 , but I might be wrong.

To be honest (and with reference to changeset/163383605 ) I suspect a bit of discussion would have helped here.
I'm confused by noexit=yes on node/8984377004/history . Presumably this is an unofficial (and hazardous?) pedestrian crossing?
I'd suggest that it needs discussion about how best to tag it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello EditWatcher,
You've deleted a bunch of tags on way/731989519 including "oneway=no". Does that mean that it _is_ oneway, or something else?
Best Regards,
Andy

I think the trick with iD is to always search for the relation number rather than guessing based on the name, because townlands/EDs/whatever can all have similar names...

Hello,
I'm guessing that way/1246468471/history might have been a Boots Opticians once, but is now a pet shop?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks - done in changeset/163566809

Thanks - done in changeset/163565825

For info - I removed a couple of extra bits from relation/6153872 so that it's now just one ring.

Hello,
Was way/371619998 removed from relation/5518440 deliberately?
Previously that relation was https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/20hZ , but now it's just two sides of a triangle.
Best Regards,
Andy