This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/161633328 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See osm.org/user_blocks/17133

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/161633328 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See osm.org/user_blocks/17133

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/161633328 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See osm.org/user_blocks/17133

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/161633328 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See osm.org/user_blocks/17133

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/161633328 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See osm.org/user_blocks/17133

Hello jajanja3 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It'd be great if you could be a bit more descriptive than "Modifying & Creating New Features" when adding changeset comments. If you have a read of osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments it'll explain a bit more.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
There's actually a discussion going on about how best to name this in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/43 - I'd suggest joining that.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
There's actually a discussion going on about how best to name this in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/43 - I'd suggest joining that.
Best Regards,
Andy

Yes (with the big caveat that I'm not at all familiar with the area!).

Thanks,
Andy

A bit more info - there's a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-by-digitalegypt-not-aligned-with-reality/124533 . It'd be great if you could comment there.

A bit more info - there's a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-by-digitalegypt-not-aligned-with-reality/124533 . It'd be great if you could comment there.

For info, there's a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-by-digitalegypt-not-aligned-with-reality/124533 . It'd be great if you could comment there.

Looking at the wider area on imagery there's definitely more tunnel=culvert that I'd have expected - I guess it's below ground level, but there's nothing over the top of it (apart from the bridges). way/742792269/history looks like an aqueduct with nothing over the top of it and the stream underneath?

Hello,
Is way/1302914758/history really both underground _and_ a bridge?
That seems an odd combination.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello again AvidFan,
Just a reminder - lots of other mappers (including me!) have commented on your changes, and have let you know the problems that you have caused. You can see these comments at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10965811 . Before doing any other OpenStreetMap updates, please read them and answer all of the questions that people have asked.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Just to let you know, after this edit there was a bit of a gap in the relation for the Sperrins AONB. I created way/1352303735 and added it to the relation to fill it in.
Let me know if you've got any questions.
Cheers,
Andy

آیا یکی از شما می تواند به عکسی از تابلوی خیابان واقعی پیوند دهد؟

Can either one of you link to a photograph of the actual street sign?

See changeset/161360974 for info

See comment on changeset/161360974 for info