Thanks! You beat be to reverting that by a minute!

Thanks - if you spot any others please let me know!

please do not revert these piecemeal

please don't revert these piecemeal

Hello,
Please don't use simple tools like osm-revert on complicated reverts like this. See the links in the forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/the-osm-standard-tile-layer-looks-wrong-white-lines-abusive-comments-etc/111583/277 and elsewhere.
Best Regards,
Andy

It looks like node/1227778538/history has already been deleted and restored once. What investigation did you do to make sure that it really should be deleted, and not added to some way or relation, or left for future mapping?

This is entirely unrelated to the Little Ale House (which is in Harrogate!). I wrote a long detailed changeset comment which seems to have been lost.
What this was actually about was a reconciliation of road and PRoW status based on various sources - survey (and imperfect signage), and PRoW status and road status from https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#15/53.7787/-1.0390/2/P (toggle the PRoW layer and zoom in to see OS OpenMap Local road status.
A Microsoft mapper contacted me because the previous state (a mixture of unclassified and track) was clearly rubbish.

Thanks!

After theis change there are now two new big gaps - is that correct? See http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=12812573 .

Thanks for trying to help, but please don't try and revert these one at a time. They will need to be done together.

Thanks for teying to help but please do not try and revert these changesets piecemeal. There are maby of them and they need to be reverted together.

Even when doing "I used this sources to verify information, not to copy any data", I suspect that you'd still need to understand the licence on that site and the terms on which you might be able to use it.
We're not going to have a full discussion about this in a changeset comment - you need to discuss it in the forum.

Nur zur Bestätigung: Unter welcher Lizenz werden die Daten auf diesen Sites bereitgestellt?

Just to confirm, under what licence is that data made available from those sites?

Thanks! I'd already blocked that user.

You quite possibly didn't change anything - I just noticed that the number of elements in the line in the database had changed, and that you were the last editor. Quite often, those two things aren't related at all - an edit to the geometry of a way that wouldn't show up in relation history might also "break" a relation, or (because I only check relations every now and again) it might have been an earlier change.

I believe that "Purple Street" etc. are from some learnosm / teachosm test data. I've reverted the changeset in changeset/152499193 .

@GbiriJoe somehow you've managed to combine the training data ("Red Street" etc.) with actual new things that you want to add. If you try again, but don't go near the training data, all should be OK.
Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!

Hello,
There's a bit of a gap in the England Coast Path now: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=11738490
I'm guessing it now goes to the east?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Should the gap in http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=899548 really exist, or should that be extended down the cycleway?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Does the new bit of NCN552 replace the old bit to the west?
There are now two almost parallel sections: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=6209872
Previously there was just a gap:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1MGF
Best Regards,
Andy