Please stop bullshitting and give a plausible answer. Explain your workflow.

So what did you actually download and what did you view it with?

Local knowledge over what timescale?

I can't vouch for either the "before" or "after" state of relation/13319965 ; only that I re-applied some name:uk that had been removed.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Following a DWG complaint I had to revert a couple of changesets that affected some objects you've edited later here. My changeset is changeset/120479705 ; see e.g. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/163701618 for what changed in each case.
Do any of your edits need re-applying?
What source were you using?
Best Regards,
Andy

How did you convert the download there into what you used here?

Please explain what data sources you have used on ALL your changesets. Do not just link to a random page on the OSM wiki that says "here are some sources that mappers in general can use".

Just wondered - is there really a gap at the southeast end of way/115087451#map=18/52.46801/-3.68178&layers=HN ? The imagery suggests that the road (with the cycle route on it) continues?
Best Regards,
Andy

Привет,
Можете ли вы объяснить немного подробнее, что вы пытаетесь изменить здесь?
Наилучшие пожелания,
Энди

Hello,
Can you explain in a bit more detail what you're trying to change here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello borovac,
I know that you've already removed the data added here, but For the avoidance of doubt, you can't use wikipedia as a direct source of names as its licence is not compatible with OpenStreetMap.
You may, of course, be able to use whatever source wikipedia's data was copied from, if that licence is compatible.
Best Regards,
Andy

@Aleksandar Matejevic Please ask your team to update their profiles to point to the relevant wiki pages (not just github - though they can link to that as well if they want)

Bonjour,
Quel changement apportez-vous réellement ici ? Ce n'est pas un changement de nom.
Cordialement,
Andy

Hello,
What change are you actually making here? It isn't a name change.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Please ensure that you and your team follow https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines . Currently there is no link from @borovac to any projects at osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities that you might be taking part in. The only mention of Microsoft there is in "Oceania, Serbia, South America, Caribbean".
Please fix these issues immediately before any further edits.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
PS: Documentation on your own private website (which is what github is) does not meet the requirements as set out at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. Please reply here or email data@openstreetmap.org if you have any questions.

Just wondered - is there really a gap between the end of way/217852800#map=19/54.10516/-8.19073 and way/1054424933 ? Both are part of the "Miner's Way & Historical Trail" but there is a gap at
relation/2885025#map=19/54.10533/-8.19065
Best Regards,
Andy

Sorry it's another world-spanning changeset. These changes were genuinely worldwide.

Thanks

Camino Mozarabe?
Shome mishtake shurely...

Hello,
Just wondered, did you do this via a JOSM revert? The changeset tags suggest you did, but the only change https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1052845128 suggests not.
We (the DWG) have had a number of complaints about people "reverting other people's changes" (including this one) when it doesn't actually look like the net result was a revert at all.
For the avoidance of doubt, changing access=YES to access=yes seems an entirely reasonable change, with the caveat that just removing the tag would make more sense given that it is a footway with a foot=yes tag already.
Best Regards.
Andy (from the DWG)