Re "FIXME=What the fuck are these notes supposed to mean?" on node/26057684/history , I suspect it's just a "note to self" by the original mapper

Obviously bits of the wall are implausible - like where it crosses the railway line - but the fact that most of it has a barrier round it is clear from the imagery.

Thanks.
The offset of the buildings with regard to imagery also seems a bit variable - does that also need checking?

Hello,
East of
node/8901430646/history
way/657422273
Looks like a stream flowing east.
Immediately west of there, it does not appear to exist.
North of
node/9325603090/history
It does appear to be a path.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello
way/962302175/history
Seems pretty unlikely - it is a track that "flows into a stream" way/962302171/history .
Best Regards,
Andy

Are you sure that the middle part of way/965674960 , around node/8933483933/history , actually exists? It doesn't look like it on the imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy

Either the imagery is way out here (in which case all the tracks you added are wrong) or the source for the location of node/8895886920/history#map=19/48.60168/24.15105 is very wrong.
Which is it?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
What is your source for way/961703850 west of node/8933482165 ? I can't see anything on the available imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy

Sorry - "this changeset" means changeset/107458287 not 114412123, since that was where this track was added.

Hello,
I'm struggling to see any sign of way/961703557 in available imagery (Bing, Maxar, Esri). Bing's pretty clear, and there's nothing there.
Please check this, and all other tracks added in this changeset.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
node/6194967015/history seems very unlikely. Apparently the path way/661712673 joins the stream here and then stops, but there is no connection to the tertiary road way/728214934/history just to the east. The imagery suggests that there is access west from the tertiary road, but the path south is actually fairly unclear. Bing appears to be the clearer imagery than Maxar here.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
What is your source for way/962737142 east of node/8905566343 ? That node was originally added by you.
On the available Bing imagery, there's nothing. On Maxar imagery it looks like there's some temporary logging access, but not all the way to node/8955362997/history (also added by you).
Best Regards,
Andy

Are you sure that way/962737350 actually exists east of node/8905571075 ? It really doesn't look like it from the imagery, even allowing for imagery offset in hilly areas. There is a cliff!
Best Regards,
Andy

I'm not sure that way/962737527 really counts as "residential" does it? Looks more like an unclassified road to me on the imagery.

Привіт, VARVAR8!
Чи можете ви пояснити, що ви намагалися тут зробити?
Візьмемо, наприклад, way/902349619 (нібито паркан, доданий вами в цьому наборі змін). Він проходить прямо через будівлю way/154166406 востаннє відредаговано вами 3 роки тому.
Це просто дуже неякісна робота від імені Kaart чи якийсь «вироблений троль», який намагається дратувати інших картографів? Якщо це було останнє, значить, це вдалося.
Поясніть, будь ласка, як ви плануєте виправити цей безлад і за який термін.
З найкращими побажаннями,
Енді Таунсенд, від імені робочої групи з даних OSM

Hello VARVAR8,
Can you explain what on earth you were trying to do here?
Take for example way/902349619 (allegedly a fence, added by you, in this changeset). It goes right through a building way/154166406 last edited by you 3 years ago.
Is this just very poor quality work by yourself on behalf of Kaart or some sort of "elaborate troll" trying to annoy other mappers? If it was the latter, then it has succeeded.
Please explain how you plan to correct this mess and over what timescale.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

@VARVAR8 - as a general point, if other mappers are suggesting that your sources are "shit" (in capital letters) then rather than just get offended at the language used, perhaps its also worth looking at whether those sources, and whatever undocumeted "#MapWithAI" processes your using actually produce valuable data worth adding to OSM?
Best Regards Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)

Hello,
Are you sure that way/981394969/history and way/981394966 actually exist? It doesn't look like they do from the imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy

"Null Island" exists in databases, but not in the real world...

Hi Nick,
I've tidied this up in changeset/114779878 . http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=269708 shows a few small spurs and gaps, some of which can probably be filled in without survey (e.g. if a signed route is on both sides of a bridge, it probably goes across the bridge too!).
Cheers,
Andy