Hello,
I think it would help if you slowed down a bit in your editing. For example, way/984849696/history clearly doesn't match the underlying imagery - you've drawn it at 45 degrees to reality. Also the shape of way/984849707/history#map=19/8.35588/123.37516 clearly doesn't match the building. Please do slow down and try and map things more accurately.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hallo frantzius2177,

Ich hoffe, es macht Ihnen nichts aus, wenn ich nach etwas frage, das OpenStreetMap vor 8 Jahren hinzugefügt hat. Sie haben der Gedenkstätte node/2353777804 hier ein "source=Google Earth"-Tag hinzugefügt. Wir können das nicht als Quelle in OSM verwenden, da die Lizenz von Google die Verwendung hier nicht zulässt. Wir müssen Daten entfernen, die möglicherweise von Google stammen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Andy Townsend, im Auftrag der Data Working Group von OSM

Hello frantzius2177,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. You added a "source=Google Earth" tag on the memorial node/2353777804 here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. We'll need to remove data that may have come from Google.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Olá Samuel Pereira de Mesquita,

Espero que não se importe que eu pergunte sobre algo adicionado ao OpenStreetMap 8 anos atrás. Você adicionou uma tag "source = Google Maps" na igreja aqui. Na verdade, não podemos usar isso como uma fonte no OSM porque a licença do Google não permite que seja usado aqui. Precisamos remover os dados que podem ter vindo do Google.

Cumprimentos
Andy Townsend, em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados da OSM

Hello Samuel Pereira de Mesquita,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag on the church here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. We'll need to remove data that may have come from Google.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hello Bennard,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag on the road here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. We'll need to remove data that may have come from Google.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Olá gabrielsantanabm,

Espero que não se importe que eu pergunte sobre algo adicionado ao OpenStreetMap 5 anos atrás. Você adicionou uma tag "source = Google Maps" na estrada aqui. Na verdade, não podemos usar isso como uma fonte no OSM porque a licença do Google não permite que seja usado aqui. Precisamos remover os dados que podem ter vindo do Google.

Cumprimentos
Andy Townsend, em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados da OSM

Hello gabrielsantanabm,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 5 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag on the road here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. We'll need to remove data that may have come from Google.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Bonjour clémentade,

Sur cet ensemble de modifications, vous avez ajouté une balise "source=Google Maps" sur le sable ici. Nous ne pouvons pas réellement l'utiliser comme source dans OSM car la licence de Google ne permet pas de l'utiliser ici - cela poserait de réels problèmes au projet si nous utilisions Google Maps comme source.
Nous devrons annuler et supprimer cette modification, ainsi que toutes les autres pour lesquelles vous avez utilisé Google Maps comme source. Ce que je vous suggère de faire, c'est de contacter d'autres membres de la communauté OSM française et de leur demander quelles images ils pensent être les plus à jour ici - et il semble que ce banc de sable soit également visible depuis la route.

Meilleures salutations
Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail sur les données de l'OSM

Hello clementader,

On this changeset you added a "source=Google Maps" tag on the sand here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
We'll need to revert and redact this change, and any others where you've used Google Maps as a source. What I'd suggest that you do is contact other members of the French OSM community and ask them which imagery they think is most up to date here - and it looks like this sandbank might also be visible from the road.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hello,
I've nudged node/2463863030/history a bit to the left here because the Rathangan Parish (historic Anglican) boundary 11061913 was no longer a valid multipolygon because it crossed back over itself:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1biD .
I've used ESRI as the imagery here, since that is closest to what other things appear to be aligned to - is that OK?
Best Regards,
Andy

Great - thanks!

Hello,
Just checking - does the Capital Ring Link really extend along Church Street as relation/12662376 suggests? Previously https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1bhE it just crossed the road?
I'm not at all familiar with this bit of London, hence the question.
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks

Hello frank692000,
Irrespective of any other issues raised, please always use changeset comments that explain what you are doing to other mappers, not just something like "add road" every time.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I've just filled in a gap in the Cleveland Way - can you check changeset/111341520 to make sure that I've understood what E2 is doing here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

Thanks. Will you take other imagery layers into account for future edits?

Thanks. Rather than just "fix tag" here I'd have said "added area=yes tag to Burnham Pier so that it is recognised as an area feature rather than a linear one".

From looking at the history relation/6058814/history , it looks like it was originally "no U turn from way/173696670 back on to itself", which does make sense. I don't understand why another mapper changed it in changeset/37893249 - maybe you could ask them, or maybe they just made a mistake? Looking through their earlier changes in this area, such as changeset/37893189 , they did explicitly add some "no U turn" relations (that changeset has the comment "Demi-tour interdit".