Hallo,
In diesem Changeset hast du "religion=christian" zu way/290010219/history hinzugefügt. Was war das Tag, das Sie hier hinzufügen wollten?
Freundliche Grüße,
Andy

Hello,
In this changeset you added "religion=christian" to way/290010219/history . What was the tag that you were intended to add here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Բարև քոչվոր հայերեն
Դուք օգտագործել եք gadm.org- ը որպես way/958637691 աղբյուրի աղբյուր, բայց այնտեղ լիցենզիան համատեղելի չէ OSM- ի հետ, ուստի հարկ կլինի հետարկել այս փոփոխությունը: Սա բացի osm.org/user_blocks/5227 էջում նշված մյուս խնդիրներից:
Հարգանքներով
Էնդի Թաունսենդ, OSM- ի տվյալների աշխատանքային խմբի անունից:

Hello Nomadic Armenian ,
You've used gadm.org as a source for way/958637691 , but the licence there is not compatible with OSM, so we'll need to undo this change. This is in addition to the other problems mentioned at osm.org/user_blocks/5227 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello PamDOB,
You've said "My understanding is that if it is multiple buildings then it should be a relation". Can you explain who, exactly, said this? I've tried to pin this down with numerous Zartico mappers in the past and haven't been able to. For the avoidance of doubt, what aweech says above ("It should either be mapped as a node or as an area encompassing the developed portion of the lot" is entirely correct.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.

Thanks

The change to "Pretty Wood" here was prompted by finding a sign for it some way to the south.

Just for info, I've split Kirton FP 25 so tht there's no longer a "spur" sticking out of the edge of the mulitpolygon of Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB.
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
You've re-added a name to http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=777004647 . I suspect that what's happened is that you haven't checked up-to-date OSM data. The source of that name, as can be seen on an adjacent way http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=128495100 , was @Botogav , and they've currently blocked been asked to explain their actions at osm.org/user_blocks/5203 .
Best Regards,
Andy

The maxspeed on way/953277014 seems wrong? See also https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19jm .

On way/702915132/history maxspeed=50;60 seems surely wrong?
Best Regards,
Andy

You've corrected the lane tags on way/953673753/history but not the maxspeed! You might also want to look at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19jj , some of which may be a similar issue.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Somethings gone wrong with the merge here way/947881929/history had obviously wrong lanes values and obviously wrong maxspeed values. There's also an overlap with another way on way/947881929 . Also, there are other related maxspeed issues at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19ji - at least some of those seem to have been roads that you have edited. In some cases you may be able to just delete your duplicate road; in others you may need to use overpass to "go back in time" to see what value was set previously.
Best Regards,
Andy

I'm guessing that lanes=30 on way/698600885 might be a typo?
Cheers,
Andy

I'm guessing lanes=20 on way/506697254 might be a typo?
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
in among the "sorting out of the merge" it looks like the lanes tag is still wrong on http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=934479984 and way/934479979 . Any idea what it should be?
Best Regards,
Andy

OK - these are all done now. Where I've reverted back to a version without name:etymology:wikidata I've re-added that tag. 3 changesets from 107746633 onwards.

Hello,
Is "lanes=1" correct on way/748562110 ? It predates your edits here by some years, but seeing as you've edited recently I thought I'd ask.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Please use meaningful changeset comments. "Changes" is not a good changeset comment, nor is "errors fixed". See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information.
Best Regards,
Andy

(to add to the comments about problems here on other changesets) way/956303023 really does look implausible. It' sallegedly a secondary road but it doesn't connect to anything. I'd suggest that, in additon to the revert that has been requested at changeset/106666695 , that changesets that add this sort of thing also get reverted too.