Hello,
I'm a bit confused by the change here to https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/224164207 - the cycleway by the side of the road is now "bicycle=no; foot=no". That seems unlikely?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hola,
Esto parece una edición automatizada. ¿Podrías indicar dónde se discutió con la comunidad?
Atentamente,
Andy
(Nota: este conjunto de cambios se enlazó desde https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/why-is-it-ok-that-id-performs-undiscussed-semiautomatic-distributed-mass-edits/139011/33)

Hello,
This looks very much like an automated edit. Can you point to where it was discussed with the community?
Best Regards,
Andy
(note - this changeset was linked from https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/why-is-it-ok-that-id-performs-undiscussed-semiautomatic-distributed-mass-edits/139011/33 )

Re https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/clarifying-default-bicycle-access-on-highway-footway-and-highway-pedestrian/139023/124 , https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/240214608 et al now have "bicycle=dismount; foot=no". I've no idea what is correct but that is an implausible combination (I've also said this on the changeset by the other recent editor).

Re https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/clarifying-default-bicycle-access-on-highway-footway-and-highway-pedestrian/139023/124 , https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/240214608 et al now have "bicycle=dismount; foot=no". I've no idea what is correct but that is an implausible combination (I've also said this on the changeset by the other recent editor).

Hello,
I have reverted the changes to the Englist and French names of https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/relation/6646538 in changeset/175899550 .

Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. Please respect each other's names for things - as you can see from https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/456788679 there have been numerous deletions by several users, including both of you.
If you continue to do that we will have to prevent you from editing OSM.

Hola Calasanz, soy Andy, del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.
Gracias por añadir una imagen de Wikimedia Commons de la señal de calle way/529079441. Como pueden ver en https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/529079441, el nombre ha cambiado con el paso de los años.
Sin embargo, sugeriría dejar las versiones "name:ca" y "name:es" si son correctas (que presumiblemente lo son). Tener todos los nombres de idiomas para una calle permite a quienes consultan los datos crear nombres en diferentes idiomas. Si se elimina name:es, no sabrán cuál es el nombre en español, ya que nada define en qué idioma se escribe "name".
Atentamente,

Hello Calasanz,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. Thanks for adding a Wikimedia Commons image of the street sign of way/529079441 . As you can see from https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/529079441 , the name has been changed back and forth over the years.
However, I would suggest leaving the "name:ca" and "name:es" versions if they are correct (which they presumably are). Having all of the language names for a street allows people consuming the data to make makes in different languages. If you removing name:es, they won't know what the Spanish name is since nothing defines what language "name" is.
Best Regards,

Hello,
I'm a bit surprised to see that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/829316713 became "bicycle=dismount" here. It's tagged as a public bridleway in OSM, which agrees with the local authority https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#19/53.25103/-1.83267/H/P , so I'd expect "bicycle" to be at least "yes". Are there signs discouraging cycling?
Best Regards,
Andy

(in the pouring rain)

@synthfi I suspect that it's forgivable in this case as they're using MAPS.ME to update the details of some airports they flew through - likely they weren't in a position to upload until they got home.

Agreed - "manmade" is pretty obviously a typo for "man_made" here.
Where problems might occur with changes like this is where both "manmade" and "man_made" were set. Here there were only 5 and only node/8322504104/history had them set to plausible different values (although there are only 30 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=scoreboard , and the existence of a subtag suggests the other value).

The obvious precaution is "not to use Google Maps as a source". There's more information at osm.wiki/Google and osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data? .

Thanks!

You probably haven't got to it yet, but way/403875321/history is also iffy.

Is there a crossing island at node/12980053851 ?

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I wouldn't add "trafic_calming=table" tp the whole of way/1441998851 ; if you look at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2gOQ you can see how it is more normally used on ways.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.

I don't know much about UPRNs, but just checking - is node/27212056 OK?

osm.org/user_blocks/19111
osm.org/user_blocks/19112