Are you sure that the height and diameter of node/2242260005/history are correct? It's apparently a London Plane that is 5 times wider than in is high. Are you sure that that that diameter number isn't a circumference?

Are you sure that the size values for node/3658274203 are correct?
circumference=0.04 and height=12 are plausible for a Silver Birch, but diameter_crown=77 is 6 times wider than it's high - unlikely for a Silver Birch, and unlikely to be supported by that 4cm-wide trunk

The tree node/10162104746/history seems to be a funny shape for a Sycamore - it's 12m high with a 30cm or so diameter trunk (which is fair enough) but has a crown diameter of 65m - 5.5 times larger than its height. Sycamores usually are not that shape...

The tree node/10162104746/history seems to be a funny shape for a Sycamore - it's 12m high with a 30cm or so diameter trunk (which is fair enough) but has a crown diameter of 65m - 5.5 times larger than its height. Sycamores usually are not that shape...

Hello,
Are the names of node/560045874 and node/12561176892 really "Brock Crags (Wainwright)" and "Brock Crags (summit)"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brock_Crags just has "Brock_Crags" (with one named, and one unnamed).
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I know it was a long time ago, but just spotted node/2847593295 - what battle actually was it?
Best Regards,
Andy

(with regard to the wiki) that's supposed to document how people map, not tell people how to map.
There are many, many wiki pages that contradict other wiki pages.
It's a useful guide, but all it tells you is that "the last person that edited that page thought X".

Actually, one more thing, "resolved issued detected by id " suggests that you think the suggestions that iD offers (including things like operator/brand, wikidata, etc.) are correct. My experience is that often they are not.
I personally would not accept any suggestion by iD unless I personally knew that the suggestion was correct.
One of the ways that iD can mess things up is described at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-automated-edit-removal-of-crossing-markings-yes-tags-introduced-in-undiscussed-automated-edits/129614/26 ; as noted there I logged that issue with them two years ago at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9529 with no positive effect.
I suspect that the presets that iD uses in Scandinavian countries will have had many fewer eyes on them than the UK ones, and many of those will be unfamiliar with grammar rules for e.g. apostrophes and capitalisation where they differ from English.

Perhaps you could take a photo of the affected area?

Hello wombatmaper,
"barrier=block" absolutely can be on a way rather than a node. Have a look at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/barrier=block - as you can see, there are 1000s of them mapped that way already.
In addition, please use better changeset comments than "resolved issued detected by id" - explained what you did and why you changed it, and what your source for that change was (survey? Something else?)
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Looks like spam to me

node/12825008634/history looks like spam to me :)

In here I've changed the Dales High Way route up Shipley Glen - relation/7152429#map=16/53.85060/-1.80649 . The previous route may once have existed, but peters out north of way/1388968997 which is a bit of a scramble back up.

Thanks!

Hello,
In the last month, a few gaps have opened up in the Robin Hood Way by the lake at Clumber
Before: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/24CK
Now: relation/1652131#map=15/53.26818/-1.05649
My recollection is that there isn't a lot of Robin Hood Way signage here, but it does fairly obviously follow the path by the lake.
Best Regards,
Andy

Oops - somehow "utility=gas; marker=pedestal" got added to the (unfortunately closed) Aldwark Arms. Maybe a preset accidentially got added in Vespucci? :)

Re your comment above "... let's raise it on the tagging list or the relevant proposal thread to get broader community input", for the avoidance of doubt in the comment that you replied to I already said "... something that I mentioned in the forum".

For completeness, that post is: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/aligning-osm-hiking-sections-with-wikivoyage/129850/44 .

Another option (something that I mentioned in the forum) would be to use a different map in the wikivoyage articles. The one currently on https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Pennine_Way is basically a road map and really not useful at any level of detail.

Привіт, KKS,
Будь ласка, напишіть невелике пояснення щодо внесених змін у коментарі до набору змін.
Це значно полегшить життя всім іншим.
З найкращими побажаннями,
Енді

Hello KKS,
Please do write a bit of an explanation about what you have changed in a changeset comment.
It makes things so much easier for everyone else.
Best Regards,
Andy