You're not really explaining yourself very well. I've asked at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-bot-like-comments-on-changesets/126587 - perhaps you could post a comment there?

Hello jajanja3, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Following on from changeset/161257413 , please do use changeset comments that actually explain what you have changed. "Navigation Detail" on its own does not really help anyone.

Best Regards,
Andy

Your question "why" was, I believe answered quite fully by the history of the object and the changeset tags here. That's why I asked the question above.

May I ask what brought this edit and the others at @NinaNesterovaOSM/changeset_comments to your attention?

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 162736067, 162736386, 162736504, 162736625, 162736843, 162737594, 162737644, 162795263, 162795676, 162795853, 162818469, 162819929.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

Hello, do you mind if I ask a personal question - are you a human?

Thanks

Currently the relation relation/4283214 is just a line with one member way/317689837 ? I'm guessing that "Part of Ausestown" is not actually a thing but "Causestown" is?

I asked my friend "Eliza" for help and she suggested asking:

Is it because you have not got any links there is an unsuitable sign
which may found at the top end covering that you came to me?