Hi Andy,

We are happy to share that our organized editing page is ready in the url below, where Facebook's current mapping efforts are listed

osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Facebook

Thanks,
Yunzhi

Hi Andy,

We are happy to share that our organized editing page is ready in the url below, where Facebook's current mapping efforts are listed

osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Facebook

Thanks,
Yunzhi

Yeah, we are planning to make a FB specific organized editing page including relevant updates. Once it's ready we will add to osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities

HI Andy,

Thank you for reaching out! We are working on expanding our OSM wiki to reflect other mapping effort aside from AI-assisted mapping. The updates will be up soon. We will keep you posted.

Thanks,
Yunzhi

Hi Richardsun,

Would you mind sharing the source of the name you added to the feature? Although I removed the part starting from "aka" based on OS OpenData StreetView, I would still like to confirm with you on the source of the one you added to make sure this is an appropriate name for the feature. Thank you!

Best,
Yunzhi

Thanks for the advices, Andy! We added the source:name tag for future reference to other users

Hi SomeoneElse,

Thank you for reaching out. We've partially reverted the name back to "Nook" based on imagery "OS OpenData StreetView". We are uncertain about the part after "aka" though. Do you think it's okay to only include "Nook" in the name? Your suggestions would be greatly valued.

Best regards,
Yunzhi

Hi JJIglesias,

We are completely with you on your suggestions and appreciate you reverting the change.

Best regards,
Yunzhi

Hi JJIglesias,

We totally agree with your opinion and appreciate you on helping to revert the changes.

Best Regards,
Yunzhi

Hi SomeoneElse,

We really appreciated you reaching out. We've reverted the changeset and had the name back.

Best regards,
Yunzhi

Hi SomeoneElse and mitchef,

Thank you for pointing this out and helping to revert the change. More investigation should have been done before making the update

Best,
Yunzhi

Hi clay_c,

Thank you for reaching out to us, and providing us more information that the street is a correct name. We've reverted our changeset and put the street name back to the feature.

Best regards,
Yunzhi

Hi mitchef,

We really appreciate you reaching out to confirm the trail name. We've reverted our changeset and added the trail name back

Regards,
Yunzhi

Hi Freebeer,

Thank you very much for sharing the example notes, and helping locating where these notes are possibly from. We've already started an investigation on OSM Notes. We will also investigate further on "report" feature in maps on Facebook, coordinate with other internal teams to make fixes when needed, to ensure reports go directly to our internal system.

Thanks,
Yunzhi

Hi alphensebezorger,

Since there isn't enough local knowledge support on the feature to indicate it's a house or a garage, we reverted it to its original version. Please feel free to make updates.

Thanks,
Yunzhi

Hi alphensebezorger,

Thank you for sharing you opinion. It was very helpful and I updated tag on this map feature to keep usage information.

Thanks,
Yunzhi

Hi alphensebezorger,

Thank you for sharing you feedback on the edits. I agree with you that it's more inappropriate to tag this map feature with amenity=school. Without more support on local knowledge about the road name, I reverted the tag change back to the version (Version #6) before our updates.

Thanks,
Yunzhi

Hi,

Joe is part of my team. I want to apologize for the continued errors. OSM is very important to us which is why we created these challenges to clean up some bad data in the first place. We will be pausing on our MapRoulette challenges while we reevaluate our workflow to ensure we do not remove valuable data.

Regarding "dumping hundreds of user complaints into anonymous OSM notes", do you mind further explaining what you mean and sharing examples? The report button for maps at Facebook has pointed to an internal reporting system since last year. No OSM notes should flow directly from any of our product surfaces, but if that is somehow not the case we would like to know.

Thank you, your feedback would be most valuable.

Thanks,
Yunzhi

That makes sense. In this case, perhaps using "alt_name" for the old version is more appropriate. How do you think?

-Yunzhi

Hi Robert,

Thank you for your comment! Using this source, https://www.royalmail.com/find-a-postcode, I believe the change is correct. I will put "not:name" tag to clarify. Do you think we should update the bus stop as well since it appears incorrect?

-Yunzhi