RVR004's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 166647502 | 6 months ago | Hi Saranya, Our team is reviewing intersections in Atlanta, and notice this crosswalk is not valid. Would you mind sharing us more information about how decision was made to map crosswalk, way/1054088630? We removed this specific crosswalk for now. If there is any clarification needed, please don't hesitate to reach out. Thank you for your help! |
| 127841222 | almost 3 years ago | Hi Andy, Thank you for the discussion above! The global data clean up was described with more details in this diary. @Yunzhi/diary. Our team has also been actively communicating with communities via changeset comments, and respecting feedback and comments from local communities. Best regards,
|
| 122456432 | over 3 years ago | Hi LockOnGuy, Thank you for reaching out and making the correction. I agree that we shouldn't have edited this feature. We will ensure to communicate before making changes in the future Yunzhi |
| 121790064 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎確認 |
| 121832556 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎確認 |
| 121800372 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎 |
| 121799346 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎 |
| 121790309 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎 |
| 121803424 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎 |
| 121832148 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎 |
| 121800355 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎 |
| 121799290 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎 |
| 121831922 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎 |
| 121831772 | over 3 years ago | 感謝你的更改, 以後我們將更為謹慎 |
| 121901225 | over 3 years ago | Hi bxl-forever, Thank you very much for your feedback. This feature was flagged as possibly needing a change by an internal validator. However, it was not a profanity flag and should not have been marked as such. We will be more careful typing our changeset comments to avoid incorrect autofills for the hashtags. RVR004 |
| 115549992 | almost 4 years ago | Thanks for the suggestions! The two tags that specify the variant are included. For tag "name:zh", which variant do you suggest to keep? |
| 115549992 | almost 4 years ago | Hi mini-me, Thanks for your comment! However, 聖彼得堡 and 圣彼得堡 are not really an alternative name to each other. Instead, they are both Chinese names of Saint Petersburg -- the former one is in traditional Chinese characters, while the latter one is in simplified Chinese characters. Thanks,
|
| 89468097 | about 4 years ago | Hi bikingaround244, Thanks for reaching out. I hadn't received any response until now about the name "shit farm". Based on our research, there isn't any official evidence revealing it as a legit name. Additionally, Richardsun's response mentioned it's a colloquial name. So the name "shit farm", may not be appropriate on OSM still under the primary name tag. However, it might be more proper to be included in tag "loc_name"(name=*). You are more than welcome to edit these features. Best,
|
| 104518075 | over 4 years ago | Hi kylenz, Thank you very much for letting us know that we made a mistake here. We will research further in the future before removing the name. Yunzhi |
| 99395673 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Andy, We are in the process of having our teams update their profiles with the new wiki page. The profiles will be all compliant in a day or two. We are also discussing the best options for the hashtags and will update the wiki once decided. We hadn't relied upon hashtags previously, as we use standardized account names so our users are clearly identifiable. Thanks,
|