Estimado EscuderoCorArq,

Gracias por sus contribuciones en OSM! Noté que agregaste este carretera Trunk (way/1020405352) y esta relación (relation/13663084) afirmando que la carretera es necesaria para la planificación vial. Ya existe un característica de carretera Tertiary que representa Calle Juan de la Luz Enríquez en OSM, por lo tanto, no se necesita una función de carretera adicional y crea problemas de validación. ¿Estás sugiriendo que se agregará infraestructura vial adicional a Calle Juan de la Luz Enrí,quez? Si ese es el caso, hay etiquetas mas apropiadas que puede usar para representar eso. En OSM Wiki (osm.wiki/Main_Page) se proporciona enlaces a orientación sobre como mapear varias características. Mirando las características que asignaste, me pregunto si `highway=proposed` y `proposed=trunk` como se describe en el Highway Proposed Wiki (highway=proposed) podría ser apropiado? Esta combinación de etiquetas se utiliza para representar una carretera que está a punto de construirse pero que aún no ha comenzado. Déjame saber tu pensamiento!

Además la comunidad de OSM Mexico tiene un Forum, un grupo de Facebook y un chat de Telegram si deseas unirse y hacer otras preguntas o hablar con otros mapeadores.

Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=79
Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/OSMMX
Telegram chat: https://t.me/osm_mx

Cordialmente,

OSMPossum

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery (Clarity); KartaView

Olá Ruan Álex,
Eu vi que você removeu a tag `highway = trunk` desta maneira way/175519703. Parece que esta é uma rodovia principal e a parte contrária à rodovia troncal para o norte way/140008275. A remoção foi intencional? A chave `highway =` é o principal indicador para estradas, ruas ou caminhos e o valor da chave identifica a importância da rodovia na rede. É importante mantermos esta etiqueta enquanto existir a rodovia. Mais sobre a chave `highway =` pode ser visto aqui (highway=*)
melhor,
OSMPossum

Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite Imagery; KartaView

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Strava

Olá 4D5G9K1,

Obrigado por suas edições, isso parece ótimo! Eu também atualizei alguns dos conectores para a classificação primary_link para coincidir com a Política de slip road (osm.wiki/Highway_link). deixe-me saber o que você pensa.

Melhor,
OSMPossum

Olá 4D5G9K1,
Vejo que reclassificaste as auto-estradas nesta junção circular. way/1000302674 to primary_link and removed the ref tags ‘SP-342’ and ‘BR-267’. Há alguma razão para que estes caminhos devam ser elos? O wiki OSM (junction=roundabout) indica que a classificação das junções circulares deve ser a mesma classificação que as rodovias que se aproximam. Diz-me o que pensas.

Melhor,
OSMPossum

Hello DeKaN,

I have edited the roundabout here (changeset/112853746) and made sure to maintain the bus routes, thank you for your insight!

Best Regards,
OSMPossum

Hello DeKaN,

I see that you remodeled this junction (way/15502030) to include short primary_link highways to access the roundabout. Was there an issue with the previous modeling which prompted you to remodel it? This new modeling suggests that 90° left and right turns are made, where drivers actually veer slightly to enter and exit the roundabout. I am wondering if the modeling of this junction can be simplified by removing the short primary_links and tangentially connecting the primary highways to the roundabout at one node on each side, like we see at this location (node/152534855)? This would allow routing on the primary highways to bypass the roundabout while providing smooth merges for drivers entering and exiting it. If you don’t mind, I can make the edit to show what I am describing.

Best regards,
OSMPossum

Hello A-lex-W

I see that you added `building=yes` here way/149419121 and commented that the bridge is being deconstructed. Is this bridge under construction or being demolished? I was not able to confirm this with aerial or ground level imagery. If the bridge is being deconstructed, there is specific tagging for that such as `removed:highway=primary` removed=*:. If the bridge is under construction and will return to functionality after rebuilding, `highway=construction` and `construction=primary` would be the appropriate tagging per the Tag:highway=construction wiki highway=construction. The 'building=yes’ tag is not applicable to a bridge of this type, according to the description of `building=bridge` (building=*#Other_buildings) and I believe it should be removed

Cheers,
OSMPossum

Здравствуйте Anton70289,

Извините, я хотел написать "въезд", а не "выезд", когда писал "выезда на трассу «Балтия»”.

Спасибо,
OSMPossum

Здравствуйте Anton70289,

Спасибо за помощь в городе Ржев в openstreetmap.(node/814620639). Я заметил, что вы реклассифицировали шоссе на южных концах 28К-0576 (relation/214267) и 28К-1179 (relation/391242) вдоль с другими магистралями в Ржев, которые соединяют эти маршруты с «Балтия». Все они были `highway=secondary`, но теперь представляют собой комбинацию `highway=tertiary` и `highway=unclassified`.. Могу я спросить, по какой причине вы изменили классификацию автомагистралей?

Судя по их роли, ведущей к основному мосту, пересекающему Волгу (way/29408977), а также плотности треки, видимых с помощью OSM GPS Traces, эти магистрали, по-видимому, являются главные дороги, используемые для выезда на трассу «Балтия». Глядя на вики-страницу RU Highway Key (osm.wiki/RU:Key:highway), эти шоссе кажутся более подходящими в качестве основных магистралей (‘highway=primary’), учитывая, что они играют важную роль в соединении Ржев с городом Тверь. (node/27000366) и Селижарово (node/94091844). Кроме того, я заметил, что основные магистрали часто проходят через города к другим важным магистралям, например ‘highway=trunk’, как в Шаховской (node/256361815) и Нелидово (https: // www. openstreetmap.org/node/3210772411). Я хотел узнать вашу точку зрения, прежде чем вносить какие-либо изменения.

Спасибо,
OSMPossum

Correction: Source used was SDFE Aerial Imagery

Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2021-07-15; OSM Data

Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; Mapillary; OSM Data

Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; Mapillary

Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; KartaView

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; KartaView

Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; Yandex Panorama

Hello angys, I’ve reviewed that area and unfortunately there are no substantial edits which can be made at this time. My team will monitor the progress of the construction over time.