OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
108649545 over 4 years ago

Correction: Source used was SDFE Aerial Imagery

108443490 over 4 years ago

Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2021-07-15; OSM Data

108005139 over 4 years ago

Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; Mapillary; OSM Data

107929529 over 4 years ago

Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; Mapillary

104280293 over 4 years ago

Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; KartaView

104279846 over 4 years ago

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; KartaView

100858532 almost 5 years ago

Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; Yandex Panorama

99855407 almost 5 years ago

Hello angys, I’ve reviewed that area and unfortunately there are no substantial edits which can be made at this time. My team will monitor the progress of the construction over time.

99855407 almost 5 years ago

We have an agreement with Digital Globe/Maxar to use their more recent high resolution imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap in JOSM or iD. However, you can also reach out to Digital Globe to ask them to update their public layers for places where you think that is needed, as is mentioned in this thread: @@kevin_bullock/diary/390153

Thanks

100450991 almost 5 years ago

Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; Mapillary

99855407 almost 5 years ago

Hello angys, I cited a Digital Globe image from 2021-02-17 which shows the road blocked off here 5.2408654, 100.4408179 and here 5.2381538, 100.4423752 and shows heavy machinery, dirt piles, and materials for developing road infrastructure. To me, this indicates there is active construction in the area. Do you have other information which may suggest there is no construction in the area?
Thanks

100003128 almost 5 years ago

Source: Maxar Standard Imagery

74418420 almost 5 years ago

Hello Siewjy,

I noticed you changed the access tags on many service highways and gates from private to permissive, in these changesets (changeset/74418420, changeset/74479230, changeset/74567100, changeset/74445459). The access=permissive tag described by the OSM wiki (access=*#List_of_possible_values) should only be used when access is open to the general traffic. You cited Bing aerial imagery for making these edits, but this resource does not support the changing of access, and it is more appropriate to assume access is limited to employees of the Changi Airfreight Centre, without ground-level resources. I have changed the access back to private, because there is no supporting evidence I can find to prove that access is open to general traffic here. If you have other reason to believe this road is accessible to the public, or have supporting evidence to confirm this access, please reach out.

Thanks!

99065298 almost 5 years ago

Спасибо за информацию.

99065298 almost 5 years ago

Здравствуйте, я основывал свое редактирование в первую очередь на этом изображении Mapillary от ноября 2020 года, которое показывает, что барьер был удален и трафик разрешен (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/awfygulgYeCmcfiag_WmOg). Яндекс Панорама от 2020 года также показывает, что нет барьера, блокирующего трафик. Я согласен с тем, что изображения Maxar показывают барьер, хотя я упомянул его только потому, что это самые недавней доступные изображения. Извините за путаницу, но я считаю, что этот барьер следует убрать.

94960853 about 5 years ago

Привіт Andriy B. Я помітив, що ви перекваліфікували житлову дорогу на вторинну у Велика Виска та додали будівельний теґ до мосту в way/300788684. Чи був ваш намір тут забезпечити тимчасовий об'їзд по другорядній дорозі, поки йде будівництво моста? Якщо так, я хотів би запитати про теґ "access = destination", який ви додали до другорядної дороги. osm.wiki/Uk:Key:access вказує, що цей теґ повинен використовуватися на дорогах, де доступ дозволений тільки в тому випадку, якщо пункт призначення знаходиться на даній ділянці дороги або території. Чи було це вашим передбачуваним використанням для поточного об’їзду? Чи є об’їзд для проїжджих десь ще в іншому місці?
З найкращими побажаннями, OSMPossum

94402264 about 5 years ago

Correction: Yandex Panorama was used for this edit

94401399 about 5 years ago

Correction: An offset of (10.82; 4.85) , Strava was used

93336214 about 5 years ago

Hello Literan, I saw this turn restriction relation/7645006 was added. Are you aware of this recent imagery which confirms traffic may continue straight? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.770943331320126&lng=37.51726031021235&z=15.502621582061302&dateFrom=2020-11-01&pKey=xo8Lk5zgrOKPcemvssoNPw&focus=photo

92964852 about 5 years ago

Hello literan, thanks for reaching out. I made my edits based on recent Mapillary images, from both directions, which show the lift gate is up well before the vehicle approaches. The northbound image is unclear, so I am curious what signs may exist. Would `motorcar=private` or `motorcar=permissive` be more appropriate on this lift gate? Also, I see there are some other lift gates missing from the data which would alter vehicle access to Нагорное. This route through a parking lot seems questionable (https://maps.openrouteservice.org/directions?n1=55.899992&n2=37.634343&n3=16&a=55.899475,37.63032,55.90223,37.629676&b=0&c=0&k1=en-US&k2=km), because there are lift gates at the west and east ends (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.90514694000001&lng=37.60848983000005&z=16.38371914608384&pKey=AQoLEPM2_s_2oqS-CgBdEA&focus=photo&x=0.5064327953684716&y=0.49155326055688625&zoom=0) and (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.90484797&lng=37.6119727&z=17&pKey=I9SDIFXPSZ8xpR5x7kOxDA&focus=photo). I have added these lift gates, if you would like to add any additional tags. Thanks!