Lieckio's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 165484893 | Looks like an office, but I don't know further than that. It also seems they might have moved. |
|
| 165484893 | Excellent question! This was done when I wasn't quite sure about the tagging (still am not, but more than back then!). It's a business that does landscaping. |
|
| 176299660 | Thank you very much! |
|
| 176299660 | You are correct, should be mml:class=39110 and then a separate tag for the source. Seems there was an error writing the tags for import that I missed. Will be a few days bwfore I am able to fix this. |
|
| 176324292 | Thank you! I had issues with this as JOSM refused to fix the problem and I couldn't figure out where the problem was to begin with! |
|
| 169747630 | Thank you! I had not found this article before! The Wiki is pretty confusing when it comes to details like this. I think a great number of the parking lots in the city that I've added need to be revised and checked... I'll have to add that to my to-do list. |
|
| 169747630 | Ah, it was actually just in one of them. Is the regular tagging scheme to tag the operator only, if it's a business parking lot? |
|
| 169747630 | Why have you marked the parking as building=yes, when they are surface parkings and not buildings? |
|
| 167242396 | Removed and taken care of. |
|
| 167242396 | Oh, sorry, I was thinking/testing of alternative ways to mark this random shop and trying to figure out what it is - forgot to remove this, as it doesn't mean anything sensible in this comment. Thank you for noticing! |
|
| 166450691 | Roger! Must have misread it at some point and have just used it accidentally instead. |
|
| 166090095 | Hey, thank you! Must have been an error in the script, that is odd tagging indeed. Will change! |
|
| 165753695 | Accidental tag; probably was supposed to be "name:en=ALLIQ" |