OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
165484893

Looks like an office, but I don't know further than that. It also seems they might have moved.

165484893

Excellent question! This was done when I wasn't quite sure about the tagging (still am not, but more than back then!). It's a business that does landscaping.

176299660

Thank you very much!

176299660

You are correct, should be mml:class=39110 and then a separate tag for the source.

Seems there was an error writing the tags for import that I missed. Will be a few days bwfore I am able to fix this.

176324292

Thank you! I had issues with this as JOSM refused to fix the problem and I couldn't figure out where the problem was to begin with!

169747630

Thank you! I had not found this article before! The Wiki is pretty confusing when it comes to details like this.

I think a great number of the parking lots in the city that I've added need to be revised and checked... I'll have to add that to my to-do list.

169747630

Ah, it was actually just in one of them.

Is the regular tagging scheme to tag the operator only, if it's a business parking lot?

169747630

Why have you marked the parking as building=yes, when they are surface parkings and not buildings?

167242396

Removed and taken care of.

167242396

Oh, sorry, I was thinking/testing of alternative ways to mark this random shop and trying to figure out what it is - forgot to remove this, as it doesn't mean anything sensible in this comment. Thank you for noticing!

166450691

Roger! Must have misread it at some point and have just used it accidentally instead.

166090095

Hey, thank you! Must have been an error in the script, that is odd tagging indeed. Will change!

165753695

Accidental tag; probably was supposed to be "name:en=ALLIQ"