Faketious edits, to be reverted
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178989782

Please go ahead and revert @Puxan, these buildings dont exist at all and there is no explanation for them
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168414147

Changeset to be reverted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168573323

Residential Road in the middle of nowhere, not connected to any other road, changeset to be reverted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168573447

Changeset to be reverted, fixtional forests that are not visible in the satellite imagery
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168574326

Changeset to be reverted, the mapper created many fixtional very tiny non existed small buildings each with 300 nodes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168577088

Changeset to be reverted, tiny non existed small builings mapped each with 300 nodes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168577111

@woodpeck, I believe Esraa is aiming to establish consistency in road name tagging by:

Setting the default name tag in Arabic, the local language of Sudan.

Adding the English translation using the name:en tag with the appropriate language code.

For example:

name=شارع الكلاكلة القبة
name:ar=شارع الكلاكلة القبة
name:en=Al-Kalakla Al-Qubba Street

This approach ensures clarity for both local users and those who rely on English.

According to the OpenStreetMap wiki, the convention for multilingual names is that the name=* tag contains the common default name in the local language. osm.wiki/Multilingual_names

Thank you @TrickyFoxy

Boundary shifted in this changeset, I would like to make a revert.

Hi, Way way/1011034412 for Puros Conservancy seems to be a duplicate of way way/1009368220

I think one of the two should be deleted

Thanks for mapping, but please use Maxar Standard imagery as it is the most recent for this area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114319696

Thanks for the review @user_5359

@Bukenya janan collected the data himself on the ground using a GNSS RECEIVER machine(T300).

The available satellite imagery is old and does not reflect the buildings as they are new.

I have helped clean up the data by removing the unnecessary node tags E, N, field_1

Congratulations Lamine!!!!

@Jovi thanks for mapping, but there some areas you can improve, always make sure you trace the correct outline of the builings.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90666022

These are toilets in a refugee settlement in Northern Uganda. DRC is Danish Refugee Council, one of the organizations that constructs toilets in the refugee settlement.

Always map buildings with square corners
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474816

Thanks Rob, removing the landuse residential is the right thing to do then redraw the settlement boundaries to separate them from the farmland. The refugee settlements in Uganda are that big, what happens is that the refugees in most cases are integrated within the community, you find refugee camps withing the community. This particular one, Bidibidi, has of recent become largest refugee settlement in the world.

Thanks for the correction Rob, will see how to cut out the agricultural landuse out of the residential polygon so there is no overlap.