InsertUser's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 89455341 | Has this been referred to DWG yet? |
|
| 88200696 | What is your source for the removal of the building near Bahamas Games Boulevard?
|
|
| 87994373 | Actually additions from serial imagery. |
|
| 87994198 | Actually additions from serial imagery. |
|
| 87994080 | Actually additions from serial imagery. |
|
| 87717544 | I think your bounding box might be a little larger than you expected here. |
|
| 87413893 | This edit directly contradicts streetlevel imagery and is completely inconsistent with OSM conventions on mapping single carriageways. |
|
| 87105146 | What is this supposed to represent? This does not look like a mountain. |
|
| 86925123 | Do you have a source for this claim? |
|
| 86924996 | Where did you find this name? |
|
| 86597997 | Thanks
|
|
| 86482550 | You seem to have deleted a couple of addresses when tracing buildings. Please don't delete useful information unless you have copied it to new geometry. |
|
| 86072524 | Where is the discussion for this mechanical edit? |
|
| 62986624 | "Sammy's Bar & Grill" appears to be in a swamp. Are you sure this location is correct? |
|
| 85731724 | Oops. Thanks. |
|
| 83779658 | I am curious. What does "us" stands for in this context? |
|
| 82879801 | The recently approved waterway=tidal_channel might be appropriate for some of these. |
|
| 82603198 | Are you sure that OSM was incorrect for ALL of these? It is reasonably common for signage or documents to simplify spelling and this simplification should be preserved in OSM if official. |
|
| 82273484 | Maxar Imagery seems an unlikely source for a road name? |
|
| 82184029 | Where did you learn of this usage? The last local mapper explicitly changed this *from* service to track and the aerial imagery shows something that looks very informal. |