OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
82183054

This appear in neither of the publicly available Maxar sources, do you have a valid source for this geometry?

82184029

Note that the previous classification of this road was done by a local mapper who is likely to have visited the road in question.
Do you have streetlevel imagery not cited in your changeset?

82019388

I do not think the staff (west) and public (east) car parks were that interconnected when I last used (one of) them. Note also that no publicly available satellite imagery that I have seen reflects the state post Dorian.

81419232

You got an updated street name from aerial imagery?

81087495

That's a little awkward, OSM normally prefers either explicit permission or statement of a compatible license if the copyright hadn't expired. Any chance of contacting the author?

81087495

What was the copyright notice on the brochure?

80535221

Funny how the real estate agents disagree huh?

79818239

Do you have a source for this name? Mapbox doesn't normally have this sort of information.

79749232

Please try to upload frequently enough that changes are on the same continent.

79660559

Changeset comment does not compute.

79582112

This deletes the wikidata tag too. Might be a good idea to transfer it to the new relation?

79358497

Where was this automated edit discussed?

79160233

Is this the name of the beach/bay itself or of a business on the beach?

79095999

As the first sentence in the wiki link says they are "... used to encode ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 two-letter country codes ..." and those codes are already in OSM, this seems a redundant addition.

78938545

I would think so. The problem isn't that the tag contains a banned word, the problem that the source is one that OSM doesn't have permission to use.
osm.wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data

78938545

If the feature has always been listed as sourced form Google, it should be deleted rather than have its history obscured.

78792633

This seems to be an odd conversation on a changeset that didn't change the name of the street.
P.S. the dual carriageway part by the roundabout still has the old name.

77782743

CC BY isn't considered compatible with OSM without a waiver so using the linked photo as a source is problematic:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

77782743

There doesn't seem to be a CC BY Waiver for this source at osm.wiki/Contributors as for other CC BY sources. Do you have a link to one?

77783746

Is this the correct end of the cay? There seems to be a prominent shadow towards the western end.