If that SW dock really is a ferry terminal then I probably wouldn't extend it to that, but maybe include the other docks?

Ah, Duck Duck Go seems to be drpping the ball on that one then.

Sorry abut that.

Why does a place that already tagged as an island group and an administrative division also need triple tagging as a hamlet?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190905594

What is your source for these names?

Do you have a source for this rather dubious name?

Do you remember which docks were included in the marina you added? The outer way is normally extended to include them.

What is your source for these wide ranging admin boundary changes?

Why do the changeset descriptions not match the changes made?

Hello,

Thanks for this.

If you are tracing buildings with square corners please try to remember to use the sQuare function in your editing software of choice.

Please don't do edits on different continents in the same changeset.

Hello,
I've just traced the buildings on this side of the road. Do you remember where this one was in relation to them?

A community discussion thread on the dilution of the term has been added here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/have-we-abandoned-recreation-grounds-as-a-concept/148430

The new industrial=shipyard area doesn't look like a shipyard in the satellite views, what are you trying to represent here?

Please save between edits on different continents, the size of the bounding box makes this difficult to review.

These were already mapped as being within a leisure=sports_centre . You even modified the outline of that sports centre when you invented a separate facility whole cloth and nested it within that sports centre.

Your complete disregard for facilities that are already mapped makes this looks like you're performing mostly semi-mechanical edit that is completely at odds with best practice.

There was a "Tennis and Sports Club" already mapped for this facility. Of course this isn't a separate recreation ground. Stop inventing new fictitious facilities when local mappers who actually know what these things are have checked and correctly mapped them as something else.

OSM terms are based on British English. "Recreation ground" is a common enough term and the OSM usage follows it. What you are doing is vandalising the map.

That's not what a recreation ground is. A recreation ground is a relatively simple park or public space for sport or other recreation, not just the place where someone has put a fence round a tennis court.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/recreation-ground
We have dedicated tagging for a place set aside for a tennis court or two: leisure=pitch + sport=tennis + count=1/2/3 as appropriate.

You are adding imaginary recreation grounds. Please stop.

Why would you replace a tennis court area with a pair of nodes that are objectively less informative? And what's with the imaginary recreation ground?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189797975

Q858513 is described as a "district-island of the Bahamas" and links to useful Wikipedia pages.

Q3339000 is described as "capital district of the Bahamas" and links to nothing but bot generated stubs.

This edit makes the OSM less useful.

Why are you replacing existing Wikidata entries with links to less useful duplicate wikidata entries for the same items?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189553609