Hi Maria Elna!
I've edited the geometry of this building (way/733773754) and this building (way/733773742) to the appropriate according to the imagery.
Thank you!

Hi Tien Tran!
I see on this building (way/450186553) not correctly tagged. If I see from how it draws in the imagery it's like land use, not a building. So, I changed this tag to landuse:building.
Thank you!

Hi surveyor54!
I've changed this way (way/257357197) and this way (way/257357190) classification to the proper classification.
Thank you

Hi katpatuka!
I've change geometry of this waterway (way/478636060#map=14/18.3691/105.8699) from this node (node/4718479531) to this node (node/668101315), because around these nodes are not aligned to the river.
Thank you!

Hi guenter!
I've changed the classification of this road (way/148591093, way/148590387, way/148592528, way/148592527) to the appropriate classification
Thank you!

Ok

Hi peetha_la!
It's just for your information. I've seen this road (way/236839357). There are many some nodes like
node/7742078527, node/7759521513,
node/7759521517, and etc. around it, shifted in your changeset.
But don't worry, I've aligned this node to the appropriate imagery.
Thank you!

Hi PQRailRider!
I've changed this road (way/477165752) classification to the residential. I think this road is appropriate for residential.
Thank you!

Hi RachBLevine!
I've changed this road (way/432401756) classification to the residential. I think this road is appropriate for residential.
Thank you!

Hi skety!
I've changed this highway classification (way/328749923) to residential. I think it's appropriate highway=residential tag than highway=road tag.
Thank you!

Hi arivenid,
Sorry for the late reply. I've just read it.
If we trace this road until a node that ends this road, we got that there is the main road set as a "tertiary" road which has a large width than this road. So, I think this road has a lower classification that "unclassified".
Thank you.

Hi EKNunez!
I think this way
way/541200008 is properly tag to unclassified. So I would changed it to unclassified.
Thank you!

Hi QuangNguyen@TMA!
I think this way is properly a residential tag.
way/232409164
So, I changed this way to residential.

Hi Suki!
I have changed the geometry of way/161135808#map=13/12.5368/107.8084
that specific around this node node/3242091601, because I see in imagery around that node on trunk road leads to the left that has a similar surface instead of to the right. And I see the right road is properly tagged to a residential road.
Thank you!

And also this highway way/231678505

Hi QuangNguyen!
I think this highway tag is properly as highway=residential than road way/231678502
So, I changed this highway to residential.
Thank you

Hi Andy Townsend,
Thank you for check my changeset. I have passed the tag of source=Google on my validation a few days ago because I focus on aligned this road to the imagery.

When I checked on this data, I think the data basically nothing left originally from Google data. So, you can revert the data, it means removing the Google source tag.

Hanif

Hi arav_ind,

I think these roads (638776819, 685372404) are properly set to "unclassified" because these roads are connecting between settlements. Let see, highway=unclassified

Then for these roads (338075154, 338075120, 338075118), I think these roads are properly set to tertiary, because these roads are connecting the villages.

Thank you

Hi arivenid
Thanks for your suggest. I think this road (654641422) is appropriate set to unclassified, beacuse this road connecting between two settlements in the West and the East.

highway=unclassified

Did you mean it roads crossing or duplicated ways/buildings?