Hi peetha_la!
It's just for your information. I've seen this road (way/236839357). There are many some nodes like
node/7742078527, node/7759521513,
node/7759521517, and etc. around it, shifted in your changeset.
But don't worry, I've aligned this node to the appropriate imagery.
Thank you!

Hi PQRailRider!
I've changed this road (way/477165752) classification to the residential. I think this road is appropriate for residential.
Thank you!

Hi RachBLevine!
I've changed this road (way/432401756) classification to the residential. I think this road is appropriate for residential.
Thank you!

Hi skety!
I've changed this highway classification (way/328749923) to residential. I think it's appropriate highway=residential tag than highway=road tag.
Thank you!

Hi arivenid,
Sorry for the late reply. I've just read it.
If we trace this road until a node that ends this road, we got that there is the main road set as a "tertiary" road which has a large width than this road. So, I think this road has a lower classification that "unclassified".
Thank you.

Hi EKNunez!
I think this way
way/541200008 is properly tag to unclassified. So I would changed it to unclassified.
Thank you!

Hi QuangNguyen@TMA!
I think this way is properly a residential tag.
way/232409164
So, I changed this way to residential.

Hi Suki!
I have changed the geometry of way/161135808#map=13/12.5368/107.8084
that specific around this node node/3242091601, because I see in imagery around that node on trunk road leads to the left that has a similar surface instead of to the right. And I see the right road is properly tagged to a residential road.
Thank you!

And also this highway way/231678505

Hi QuangNguyen!
I think this highway tag is properly as highway=residential than road way/231678502
So, I changed this highway to residential.
Thank you

Hi Andy Townsend,
Thank you for check my changeset. I have passed the tag of source=Google on my validation a few days ago because I focus on aligned this road to the imagery.

When I checked on this data, I think the data basically nothing left originally from Google data. So, you can revert the data, it means removing the Google source tag.

Hanif

Hi arav_ind,

I think these roads (638776819, 685372404) are properly set to "unclassified" because these roads are connecting between settlements. Let see, highway=unclassified

Then for these roads (338075154, 338075120, 338075118), I think these roads are properly set to tertiary, because these roads are connecting the villages.

Thank you

Hi arivenid
Thanks for your suggest. I think this road (654641422) is appropriate set to unclassified, beacuse this road connecting between two settlements in the West and the East.

highway=unclassified

Did you mean it roads crossing or duplicated ways/buildings?

I've removed these ways because there are not visible ways in both DG Premium Imagery or DG Standard.

Thanks for your advice.

Okay, saya menggantinya karena jalan ini menghubungkan antar permukiman. Dan tidak masalah jika klasifikasi unclassified memiliki nama jalan, highway=unclassified

Okay, alasan saya mengganti klasifikasinya ke unclassified sebagaimana terlihat pada citra jalan ini menghubungkan antar permukiman dan tidak terlalu panjang. Dan tidak masalah jika yang terklasifikasi unclassified permukaannya itu beraspal (highway=unclassified)

Please don't added road those are not visible in satellite imagery

And please don't edit the roads those have tag import:yes and source:digitalglobe, because those tags are have been improved properly.

Hi mutpuri, please don't added roads if those roads are not visible in satellite imagery, and please aligned these roads to DG Premium Imagery. We use DG Premium for primary basemap.