please review way/89763181:
would it be okay to change highway=racetrack to highway=raceway so that it is rendered in the map?

would it be okay to change highway=racetrack to highway=raceway
so that it is rendered in the map?

hmm, I don't see any gps tracks in JOSM.
I am not a local, can't say more.

please review:
way/319479338 has the tag
highway=obsoloete
What do you try to say with this?
Is it an existing way that will be destroyed soon? Or is it obsolete in OSM because there is no way?

please review:
way/69727080 has tag
highway=nothing_there
note=destroyed by harvester
Is that still true? If yes, is the relation
still up to date? Shouldn't the way
be tagged highway=dismantled ?

please review:
way/136954695 has the tag
highway=not_path
If this should not be deleted,
what about highway=path + trail_visibility=bad ?

please review:
what is meant with highway=nostop
on node/3029263391 ?
It looks like a highway=noext node,
but highway=nostop seems to indicate that one can go on here? If yes, please add the way.

ja, verstehe ich. Ich würde ja meinen, das
highway=no das schön ausdrückt, aber genau von diesem tag wird mit "do not use" ausdrücklich abgeraten.

interessant. Ich untersuche gerade diverse highway=* tags, die so etwas zum Ausdruck bringen (wollen). Siehe auch
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-quot-highway-quot-that-doesn-t-exist-tt5857111.html
Mir ist noch kein gutes tag eingefallen, das nicht mit einen Life-cycle zu tun hat sondern nur sagen will "mappe hier keinen highway"

Bitte prüfen:
Weg 294501788 hat das sehr ungewöhnliche tag
highway=no_way
In Bing sieht man sehr deutlich einen Weg. Ist Bing nicht mehr aktuell?
Dann wäre wohl highway=dismantled passend, ansonsten evtl. highway=path,
access=private oder so was?

Bitte prüfen:
kann man hier nicht highway=no_path
durch highway=path + trail_visibility=no
(oder horrible) ersetzen? Siehe
trail_visibility=*

please review:
way/320255316 has tag highway=no-track. If you think it should be in OSM,
what do you think about highway=path +
trail_visibility=no ? See
trail_visibility=*

please review:
what does the tag highway=natural
on some nodes mean ? Is it a typo?
nodes: 1697289695,1697289697,1697277217,1697289701

maybe you want to tag the meaning?
I still have no clear idea what the sign looks like, maybe destination=* :
destination=*

sorry, I am not an expert for traffic signs.
This node popped up in my list of unusual highway tags. As I said, traffic_sign=*
is the usual tag.

I found traffc_sign=highway_number is used 4 times, guess that is better,
traffic_sign=road_number would also be new.

please review:
it seems you tried to map some kind of boundary here?
I've changed the relation from
highway=multipolygon to
type=multipolygon, but you have to add
other tags, else both objects are obsolete.

okay, sorry, I did not see that. No idea what traffic_sign that might be :-(

please review:
the tag highway=motorway_signal
is rarely used. Maybe that is a traffic_sign=* ?
If yes, what sign?

please review:
node/288529429 has tag
highway=road_sign
which is rarely used.
I assume you meant traffic_sign=* ?