OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
31818925 about 10 years ago

please review:
way/253651981,way 115687344
I guess it should be
highway=residential
but what about the surface ?

34669540 about 10 years ago

please review:
I've just corrected a wrong tag
for way/119401978

34045018 about 10 years ago

please review:
way/13049868 looks wrong,
highway=primary + surface=grass?

33253528 about 10 years ago

please review :
way/365002632
has invalid tags:
highway=residential;unclassified
tiger:county=Utah, UT;Wasatch, UT

31565513 about 10 years ago

bitte beachten:
highway=residential;unclassified
ist ungültig. Habe es gerade geändert.

33069876 about 10 years ago

please review this and many more changesets in this area:
tags with prefix addr: should not be used
for highways, please use the corresponding
tags with prefix is_in:

34631040 about 10 years ago

please review:
I've corrected a wrong tag on way/138410286:
highway=residential;unclassified
to
highway=residential
I've also added some more roads,
maybe you know the names for them?
See changeset/34669313

33462312 about 10 years ago

nicht einverstanden?
Im Moment fehlt der Weg einfach auf der Karte, weil
highway=service;residential
keinen Sinn ergibt.

34449405 about 10 years ago

please review:
way/123158137 (name=Якорный проспект)
has now invalid tag
highway=residential;tertiary
and disappeared from the map

33472589 about 10 years ago

bitte prüfen:
highway=residential;tertiary
ist ungültig.
name=Obersammelsdorf...Lanzendorf
sieht auch seltsam aus.
Evtl. sind alle Strassen mit diesem
Namen highway=tertiary?

32215868 about 10 years ago

I've corrected a few invalid tags like
highway=residential;road

If you are a local, please review
changeset/34668639

25084368 about 10 years ago

please review:
footway=ebankment
is a very unusual tag. Was ist
meant to be embankment=yes ?

20538780 about 10 years ago

please review:
highway=footway
footway=footway
looks wrong. Are these ways only
for pedestrians or also for cyclists?

31477363 about 10 years ago

please review: invalid tags for
way/32269418:
highway=residential;tertiary
surface=paved;unpaved

33052540 about 10 years ago

please review:
way/107885451 has invalid tags
highway=track;residential
surface=earth;cobblestone
Maybe split the way where the surface changes

33230459 about 10 years ago

please review:
way/125098394 (Rua Marfim) doesn't appear on the map
because it has the invalid tag
highway=residential;track

33745204 about 10 years ago

please review:
way/124168720 has invalid tag:
highway=residential;track
Also suspicious:
yh:WIDTH=1.5m〜3.0m;3.0m〜5.5m

31478008 about 10 years ago

please review:
way/43533380 now has invalid tags
highway=residential;track
surface=paved;ground;unpaved

30428681 about 10 years ago

you missed two small pieces

33485481 about 10 years ago

please review:
some ways don't appear on the map because they have the wrong tag
highway=unclassified;track