@whammo if you're botting an upgrade to chick-fil-a, kids_area:indoor=yes would be nice to have on the ones that are flagged with it on the website.

This change seems like it's pretty off. You set the indoor_seating to no all these Chick-fil-A's and they all have indoor seating...

Why did you remove the addresses here? If theses bars map to the building one to one, the nodes should be merged with the ways. Not stripped of their addresses.

@pb-mapping I created them. You made them side walks. I merely changed them back to footpaths, as they were when I created them. For an example see this way/1413117430

@Vladislav Konoplev I shouldn't have called your mistake "vandalism." That was rude of me. We're all trying our best and you conducted yourself like a pro when confronted. I acted rash because I was referencing this from an article I wrote, and I had invested a lot of time in it. But I should have assumed good faith. You can read the article hear if you want,

https://evancarroll.substack.com/p/open-street-map-versus-new-york-times
https://evancarroll.substack.com/p/camp-mystic-cabins-and-the-100-year-flood-plane

I spent hours to research these cabin names. These should not have been removed.

changeset/168971073

You can see the source I used in the metadata, just fyi..

changesets_count 3003
created_by iD 2.33.0
host osm.org/edit
imagery_used Bing Maps Aerial
locale en-US
resolved:outdated_tags:noncanonical_brand 1

I didn't. I said you could. I did the right thing. You want to verify it, I'm telling you how you can verify it. But you can use any means at your disposal to verify anything. I used the force; I am a Jedi. I know what a Farm Store looks like.

I don't even understand your question. I knew that a building didn't cover a road, I made the footprint smaller, and put a roof over it. I'm done here. ;)

NSI tag upgrade*

https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/10929/commits

It's an NCIS tag upgrade. The roof can be verified on Google Maps (but it's the same with 90% of the Farm Stores brands, that's how they franchise so cheap).

It's a LibreOffice Impress presentation, but the short answer if you don't want to see my awesome osm presentation is because that's what the sign says in the front, and some of the stores! The appraisal district is wrong here.

@skquinn I did a whole presentation on it see slide 8, https://github.com/EvanCarroll/tech-presentations/blob/master/map_gis/osm_intro.odp Enjoy. Come out to HLUG sometime.

Happy to do that. I also know better, and should have done that. ;) my bad. good catch.

Np. Using RapiD it's very easy! If you're in Houston and want to join up with other OSM'ers check out HLUG!

Good suggestion. Done!

Personal information and background, now that you know where my parents live. I use OSMAnd, so I want to have to have 100% certainty where all my usual drives go. The rest of the houses in this neighborhood are just less of a concern. But I did map out their golf course.

I don't believe so. Help me out, is there anything that would leave you to believe I did? I think I just wanted to show someone how to map a house, so I used my parents.

I agree, it's not idea but I do believe I checked this out with OSMAnd, and the result was sidewalk navigation done without names would in fact otherwise say "walk 0.21 miles and Turn right on the sidewalk" without the name. So it does make for a better user experience.

@Allison P, the guidance on the wiki is that you can and it's better:

> A drawback of this approach is that acquiring a name of the associated street in an automated way is challenging. Some mappers therefore add name=* or street:name=* tags copying the name of the street to separately mapped sidewalks.

Without this routing will not be able to tell you sidewalk you're turning on to.