DianaDemchuk's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 135686029 | Good afternoon! Thanks for noticing quickly. At the moment, the problem has already been fixed, but we will be more careful. |
|
| 131380156 | Hi, thanks for the clarification. |
|
| 129786965 | Thanks for noticing and fixing it. I will be more careful. |
|
| 128945571 | We are glad that our result is noticeable and useful to you <3 |
|
| 127676036 | Thank you, we are glad that our result is noticeable and useful to you! |
|
| 126662120 | Thanks for the clarification. Now the situation on the map looks more accurate. |
|
| 121707588 | Got it, thanks for fixing it! |
|
| 121704098 | In this section, there was a corner that was pulled down, and I returned it to its place and now the road geometry looks valid! |
|
| 121303762 | Geometry broken! Fix it or you'll have to revert the edit! |
|
| 121716749 | I reviewed this and the previous CS, thanks for the reverted. |
|
| 121716838 | Thank you for noticing! I will take this error into account. |
|
| 119345801 | ||
| 119345801 | Thank you for the clarification. I will be more careful. The revert will be done within 10 minutes! |
|
| 118722170 | Thanks for the clarification. In priority, we use PNOA, but they are not always loaded (depending on the location)! |
|
| 117813593 | Thank you for looking and fixing this restriction. We will raise the issue of their relevance with the validators. |
|
| 117812148 | Thank you, I will review this section and be more careful. |
|
| 117810994 | Yes, I made a mistake, from my comment it is noticeable that I added a completely different restriction, but by mistake I added "no"! Here is my inattention. Thanks for noticing and fixing it! Everything is logical here, there should not be a reversal, this will not happen again! |
|
| 117510047 | Thanks for the correction and comment! A good case to avoid getting into such a situation in the future. |
|
| 117151237 | Thank you very much for the information that this is no longer relevant. Editing was done according to the pictures (and they looked valid). I saw the revert, thanks for the promptness! |
|
| 116948247 | Yes, I changed to a newer tag. The old case also looks valid, but it is already considered obsolete. Here is the article abandoned=* Therefore, I am attaching a new chenset
Thanks for your attention. Together we will make the map better! |