What mad you think there wasn't already a station node at St Pancras?
node/3662847634

As you wanted to change the value why didn't you do it?

node/11195534037

Hi
Is this atm inside the newsagents, or in the wall of the closed bank?

Instead of removing tags why don't you update & improve them?

Hi
"Which should be shown here?"

Good question. When there are restrictions, such as fences stiles & bridges, I map to the real world as we don't want people falling into waterways.
If it's across open land I tend to map as the definitive PROW. However I've had a couple of cases where old zig-zag paths were aligned with field boundaries which had long since been removed. Mapping it as anything but a straight route across the larger field would have been ridiculous.

If the land owner has made sweeping changes it might be worth enquiring with the local authority if it was with their knowledge.

Hi again
If possible please retain valid existing ways, if their accuracy requires amending it's possible to unstitch them from existing features & to realign them.

Their history is useful for reference.

way/141250603/history

Hi
Why have you removed the Southern section of this public right of way (BRAD89)?
way/61744405#map=17/51.35603/-2.25543

https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=fec7fbd3-bd5a-4785-88a8-fe66e2928af3&cp=51.355482%7E-2.256874&lvl=16.9&sty=s&style=s

Oh & apologies for the terseness in my OP. I thought sent you a previous changeset comment explaining in more detail, but appears not to have registered.

changeset/140183021

I'm unsure as I never use these apps primarily because they appear, as in this case, to create more problems than they solve.

Hi Your edit appears to have caused a split in the NCN 4 cycle route. Could you take a look at it please.

way/1203094564

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318929

Hi
And another NCN 4 split:
way/1190452939/history#map=19/51.40292/-1.33052

Hi
Another NCN4 split

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318928

way/1190685472/history

Is there a reason only the NCN relation was deleted?

Hi Your Cotham Updates appear to have split NCN 4. Could you take a look please.

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318928

Hi
By amend this you caused a split in NCN 4 cycle route. Could you please fix. way:way/824110979#map=18/51.57161/-3.43448

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318930

Hi
Please don't attach ways to boundaries which don't exist as a physical object on the ground:
way/1205888556#map=17/51.34893/-2.26991

Hi

Could you provide details where the two lines are described as the GWML in Sectional Appendix?

Isn't the whole route maintained by MTREL?

It's unclear why you think other *services* using the EL means it isn't the EL.. Manu services use many different lines throughout the country.

Why did you abruptly end your amendments at a bridge West of Maidenhead?
Why did you a remove section in Slough?

Ta

Is there just one platform which continues under the bridge?
way/1204742501#map=19/52.77260/-4.09655

Two of them are on none motor vehicle ways, so any router should be able to discern.