How do you know there is a bridge at this location?
way/663936824

Thank you.

Looks good. Thanks
Are you local? if so, Would you be able to check for any NCN signage south of the station & on Eastwards? It would be great if the NCN could be joined up at this location.

Hi Tim
relation/192467#map=18/50.99756/-1.48557

Please note you've extended the NCN 24 route relation ito the cul-de-sac. Could you plit & remove please.

Hold your horses, Pete!

Welcome to OSM.

Please be aware some courses are already named in the enclosing boundary around the track:
way/564472001#map=15/51.4160/-2.4045

Cheers
DaveF

Hi
Could you provide a more descriptive comment than 'grtbrtn' please.

Hi
Check out OverPass Turbo:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/F2A
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/F2C

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/F2A

Hi
You made some edits around Great Yarmouth. Could you clarify what your objective was? There's an overlapping way. It appears to be preventing The Broads boundary relation from rendering.

Is it meant to indicate internal areas that aren't part of The Broads?
Cheers
DaveF

I've removed all NP tags from the ways & transferred them to the relation. On ways left without any tags I've added a clarifying note to hopefully dissuade mappers from adding tags to them.
The relation is rendering on the main map (line & label around the borders). The darker green fill & main label shown when zoomed out it displaying, but will hopefully when the tiles get render in the next couple weeks.

I find http://ra.osmsurround.org/ very useful to check the validity of relations.

If OSMand still isn't rendering it might be worth contacting them to see if they can update their code.

* shouldn't be added...

I'm about to make the amendments: What is the correct prow_ref for this way: way/636044642#map=16/53.3660/-1.9385

FYI the prow_ref should be added to the 'name' tag

Hi
Leave it with me. There's been a couple of other edits after yours that require attention.

TBH It's not really your fault. iD isn't great at visually displaying relations. To keep a check, scroll the 'Edit Feature' side bar down to the bottom to double check.

Hi
I think you've misunderstood how the National Park was constructed using tags within a relation:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/EVE
Placing the tags on ways is erroneous (They don't render on the standard map) & has always been incomplete:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/EVF

You extended an existing way as indicated by this node:
node/6103593096
It had the PDNP relation on it. However the adjacent roads & ways already had that relation:
way/169013312

It looks like another user also added some incorrect tags.

Hi
You appear to have duplicated & offset a whole section of the Peak District Nation Park:.
way/650691621#map=11/53.3465/-1.9353

Could you explain what you were attempting so I can hopefully fix it?

Your edits may need to be reverted to rectify the problem.

Hi
Are you aware you've added the Peak District National Park relation to way/636044642/history
& other ways such as path Hayfield BW 5?

This makes a mess of the relation: relation/2176657#map=17/53.36881/-1.94377

Your edits may need reversing ot sort it out.

Hi
I'm unsure what you were expecting to see other than what's already rendered.
changeset/65917515
This is a test. Note the relation renders without the boundary tag on the way & the polygon with just the way boundary tag doesn't render at all.

Has the runway & surrounding area been dug up? It would beneficial if this was still rendered with it being such a large area.

Hi
Can you provide evidence these roads have a ref of 'MC*'? The link you give show no such label

Hi
Why did you add Chiltern AONB boundary to ways when it's already tagged in a relation? relation/7129946

Hi
Welcome to OSM.Good to see you updating your centre.
A couple of things:

Doe the art centre occupy the whole building? If so, adding the tags from the 'tourism' node to the building outline would be better.
Is Divas still there & is it a part of the centre or separate entrances?

is your toilet customer only, & only usable during opening hours?

Adding an entrance might be useful: entrance=*

OSM is 'geospatial' so a node inside a building can be determined to be a part of that building. This makes the relation & 'inside' nodes a bit redundant (& much easier to map). You've also added an extra relation. I can help sort it out if you want.

Wouldn't it be great if you could use the much more detailed OSM on your website instead of the non-user friendly Google?