OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
65131453 about 7 years ago

I refute your claim it was undiscussed & uncontrolled.

65131453 about 7 years ago

"it was decided that transient data such as this should not be included as tags"

"we agreed to not put transient data from the fhrs dataset into OSM"

Al* data relevant to fhrs can be obtained via the fhrs:id link.

There is no sell by date on decisions taken to improve the database's quality.

The maintenance of these tags in OSM can best be described as 'poor'. By law local authorities have to maintain FHRS data. There is no point in OSM doing it as well.

The majority of tags were at least 6 years old. I suspect that not only are the tags poor data, but many of the establishments are closed.

I believe these edits improve the quality of the OSM database.

65131453 about 7 years ago

Yes. fhrs:rating=*

64867497 about 7 years ago

Done

47736990 about 7 years ago

Your last two edits have erroneously added address tags to *every* node. please learn to use the editing tools wisely before proceeding. I suggest you use iD instead.

65061300 about 7 years ago

That the was previously one word + all the other evidence suggests the signwriters messed up & still sways it to one word IMO. I'll put the two word version in the alt_

65061300 about 7 years ago

Hi
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3751863

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=metro+centre

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Ebs

http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/service/timesandfares/MCE/BLO/041218/1015/dep

http://naptan.app.dft.gov.uk/datarequest/help

Please publish your evidence it's two words.

65031668 about 7 years ago

You could have used the 'straight ahead only' rule. 4 rels instead of 8.

64973426 about 7 years ago

Open to persuasion, but they have separate CRS & NapTAN codes, their own entrance & run a separate service to the main concourse.

64710679 about 7 years ago

Thanks

64710679 about 7 years ago

Hi
Can I check what a negative height refers to?
way/22925660#map=17/55.85828/-4.25673

Cheers
DaveF

63800817 about 7 years ago

I've reverted both changesets

64742085 about 7 years ago

Hi
Welcome to OSM.
If this department occupies the whole building it would be worth mapping it. You can use adjacent buildings & their tagging as examples.

Cheers
DaveF

63800817 about 7 years ago

Hi
relation/4220153/history

Has all this & surrounding area become residential?

64421224 about 7 years ago

Please don't tag incorrectly to suit the renderer. if it's a kissing gate it needs to be tagged as such. The OSM database is rendered in many different way, some of which show kissing gates.
https://leaflet-extras.github.io/leaflet-providers/preview/

64227458 about 7 years ago

Hi
Welcome to OSM.
Something's gone wrong with your edit. What is it you're trying to achieve?

63609968 about 7 years ago

That maybe the new name of the company, but not the lettering of the signage. You've got ahead of yourself.

63556054 about 7 years ago

Does the tagging, as is, excludes taxis?

63536898 about 7 years ago

Hi
Is there reason you believe the A403 isn't a trunk road?
From the wiki:
Trunk - "primary A road (green signs) "

62793152 about 7 years ago

How can cul-de-sacs be oneway? Please stop fantasy mapping