DaveF's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 37097704 | almost 10 years ago | Hi Malcolm
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details Using natural=water, water=* allows data users to more easily determine whether it's a river, canal, lake etc. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-February/016422.html |
| 36962708 | almost 10 years ago | What was the mistake?
|
| 36940576 | almost 10 years ago | The link to gave ot the install page is incomprehensible gobbledygook. How anyone is meant to decipher is byond me. Typical of so many OSM wiki help pages. Did you know about these addition from the carto forum discussion? |
| 36940576 | almost 10 years ago | You serious expect users to set up their own carto just to see why it isn't working properly? Please get Sandbox to render the test database. |
| 36824880 | almost 10 years ago | Presuming the road does have weight restriction signage, of course. |
| 36824880 | almost 10 years ago | Hi CDPC Welcome to OSM If this road is unsuitable for HGVs could you please tagged these roads (& any others in the vicinity) as per this widely used tag:
Thanks Dave F. |
| 36785564 | almost 10 years ago | Hi Richard
Has there been some major work on the dockside? |
| 36624753 | almost 10 years ago | Hi again. The area you've tagged as pedestrian is a part of a residential multipolygon relation & doesn't require any additional tags. Are you sure an access road to a car park is tertiary? |
| 35556511 | about 10 years ago | Thanks for doing that. |
| 35484636 | about 10 years ago | Sorry, but I'm not willing to do that. People who make substantial errors should clear it up their own errors. I learnt how to use the JOSM revert tool for precisely that reason. With over 2000 edits you should be able to do the same:
Please be aware Aerial photography is *always* history. If the map doesn't correspond with the images it's usually due to the images being out of date. it should always be treated with caution & further checks should be made, preferable by surveying on the ground. I look forward to seeing these roads amended to how they were accurately mapped previously. Cheers
|
| 35484636 | about 10 years ago | http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/sites/default/files/widcombe_parade_revised_scheme_plan.pdf |
| 35484636 | about 10 years ago | Can you revert this changeset please. There's a new road layout that's been accurately mapped. Thanks |
| 35285099 | about 10 years ago | Hi
|
| 12843284 | about 10 years ago | Hi Could you provide the specific way(s) please. You've edited quite a few & it's difficult to determine which one you're talking about. Cheers
|
| 35285099 | about 10 years ago | Hi The bollard is already mapped. |
| 34549392 | about 10 years ago | Hi jonkellas
|
| 34530364 | about 10 years ago | Please stop making erroneous edits |
| 34478739 | about 10 years ago | Hi albryant1 Can you explain the reason for your deletion of this way please: Cheers
|
| 34495446 | about 10 years ago | Hi RFaith
Please change the background in iD to 'OS OpenData StreetView' to see the true name of the road. Note wood name also. Cheers
|
| 34325458 | about 10 years ago | As you are making no valid edits, could you please refrain from splitting ways. If & when you have maxheadroom please follow the guidelines here: maxheight=* |