OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
60683161 over 7 years ago

My overall objective: To remove duplicated information (railway=station) & to store tags relevant to rail stations in one entity instead of splitting it between two.
Once I'd done that there was an irrelevant 'site' relation, so I deleted it. In fact these 'site' relations are irrelevant anyway. I believe some have got obsessed with creating unnecessary collections of things (see stop_areas). The wiki page is marked as abandoned. I note the platforms weren't included so it wasn't a very complete collection anyway

I'm not keen on railway=station being attached to building=train_station as there are often multiples of such buildings & can be a distance from the actual station, especially in large cities like London.

59606086 over 7 years ago

Tim has performed similar edits. I think all his changesets need a review. I was hoping he'd do it.

57338231 over 7 years ago

And this one Tim
It looks like all your edits may need to be reverted. Please learn how to map responsibly. There are lots of tutorials on the web. Remember, it's not just a map/database for your benefit or hobbies.

59606086 over 7 years ago

Oh Dear Tim
This needs to be removed. The temp circuit is not a separate way.
Could you please review all your edits for similar duplication please.

56503680 over 7 years ago

Tim
Why have you created duplicate ways? There's clearly just one stretch of tarmac

51449706 over 7 years ago

Hi Tim
Viewing current onboard footage I'm unsure what your addition is representing.
The chicane used is already mapped.

59849750 over 7 years ago

Hi
Do you know where NCN4 has been rerouted?
way/191696719#map=18/51.59132/-3.78039&layers=C

59347049 over 7 years ago

It's temporarily closed for repair work of the bridge over. While it's closed it's still designated as a public footpath.

59785706 over 7 years ago

Hi KingHelps
All parks = open space provided for recreational use.
All open space provided for recreational use /= parks.
Is it used for recreation?
If you said to any 8 year olds you're taking them to 'the park, & went there, would they be happy or disappointed?
Not conclusive, but a good guide: https://www.bristol.gov.uk/museums-parks-sports-culture/parks-and-open-spaces

59583986 over 7 years ago

Hi Neil
You've split/duplicated the YMCA way/594364550 way/39275886
Was this to add the shops as polygons on Broad St?.

59565716 over 7 years ago

Hi Neil
It also shows Found on the right window.
Video from Sacco's rear window: https://www.instagram.com/p/BiO0h7ZgXPM/

59565716 over 7 years ago

Isn't Sacco hair above Found? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De7sEgAXkAAwjHo.jpg

59510756 over 7 years ago

Is Gardiner Haskins Homecentre the building's actual name?

59130957 over 7 years ago

Is that an official name? Signpost or an OoC map?

59017559 over 7 years ago

Hi Mike

If a pub is just a building then the tags should be placed on it, but if, as in this case, it also includes a car park & garden or even multiple buildings then it's more accurate to map a boundary polygon around everything owned by the pub. "beer_garden=yes" & "outdoor_seating=yes" are still valid tags. I would map cafes & hotels with similar features in the same way. I wouldn't take wiki pages as gospel; many were written when the likes of pubs were mapped as just a node. With the ability to zoom in further being introduced, it allowed more detail to be added, hence the pub as drawn now. The schema came after buildings were more commonly drawn.

59017559 over 7 years ago

Hi Northisland
FYI where pubs have external land the pub details are tagged on the perimeter boundary. This is similar scheme to schools/hospitals etc.

58883227 over 7 years ago

Excellent, thanks.

58883227 over 7 years ago

Has this entertainment facility closed?

58210630 over 7 years ago

Hi DonalMcL
Welcome to OSM
I'm curious what schema you're using for indoor mapping. Do you have a link?

Should buildingpart be building:part?

way/580417826#map=19/51.37995/-2.32839
This way (& others) appears incomplete & is mapped over an area that isn't a building. Is this correct?

You've created nodes such as this at each corner of a room. Are they required?:
node/5556314447
Instead of tagging the nodes of the room way you've overlaid a separate node. You can test this by dragging the separate node. It doesn't drag the way. I'm pretty sure this is incorrect.

You have two relations with the same name:
way/580417817

58194472 over 7 years ago

You've deleted the building tag from both. Please revert. As you know what they are, is there a reason you can't add their new usage?