I've done most of them, but I did leave a few. Just pull them into JOSM and click validate (for literal point inside polygon).

While I agree fuel stations shouldn't be mapped on the buildings, I wouldn't spend my time doing it.

My annoyance with these changesets is the the apparent lack interest in duplicates. If you've spent your time on these POIs, why move from a building to a node when a way already exists? I know the duplicates already existed before, but moving them doesn't help. In fact it makes the data look fresher.

eg
node/14294072685
way/742523813

It seems like addr:street got worse in this changeset, also nsi_id doesn't really belong in OSM.

Hey, it seems when a shop changes you are deleting the object in OSM and creating a new one. This isn't ideal because it can lose data and metadata.

In this case you deleted "Hidden Beauty" and added "vacant shop". In the process the address was lost, as well as the metadata that can be used to see how a shop changes over time.

node/6122198369/history/5#map=18/50.757965/-1.288710
node/13806042997/history/1#map=19/50.758038/-1.288590

In iD you can "Downgrade" a object to remove shop tags, leaving the address. In JOSM you have to delete the shop tags manually.

Hopefully JOSM will add a validation rule. https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/24877#ticket

You are welcome, I have made the same mistake myself :)

Thanks changeset/187424993

The nodes seem fine, but the relations seem like a mistake

Any objection to these relations being deleted?

Hey, this looks pretty broken, do you know where it was meant to be? way/1465226689

I've just noticed the shop was reopened in changeset/185542668

I'll restore the fuel station, thank you

Do you know if Shell was closed permanently? It's open on the Shell website, and Fuel Finder. node/2363540197

Sorry

I don't know what you mean by "openstreetmap API", I'm not being pedantic, there are many APIs, most of which aren't OSM APIs, but APIs to access OSM data.

@Darren in your comment you say "car park shows up as Atherleigh Way when you are on it", I'm missing some context, what shows you as being on Atherleigh Way?

We don't typically "map for the renderer", it's usually best to fix the software. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Thank you

Hey, what is image=6643145 meant to represent? Is there a URL we can use?

way/118900779

Thank you note/5118342

way/1447622966

Was this meant to be highway=services or highway=service? surface=path is also questionable.

Was this intentional? I can't see it on Esri.

way/1474096525

If it was, it should probably be highway=service. If it wasn't, it should be removed.