O TY TY! Many thanks for the catch!

Ahh, that makes a lot of sense! BTW if you're on android a really good editor for filling in data on OSM is Street Complete.
https://streetcomplete.app

Thank you for contributing to the map! Unfortunately it looks like you placed one of the trees on a way unrelated to the tree. It doesn't really hurt anything but it's usually best to not mix features with landuse.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions and best of luck mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174923513

Thank you for contributing to OSM! Just a small note, if you change a store to vacant you should delete the name and opening hours as well. Best of luck with any future mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175950824

Thank you for contributing to OSM! Just a small note, if you change a store to vacant you should delete the name and opening hours as well. Best of luck with any future mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175950824

Reviewed this as good on OSMCha because technically there are no issues with the data you've added. However it's usually not a good idea to make two different changes that far apart in the same changeset. Consider splitting edits that are far apart into different changesets in future.

Thank you for improving the map and welcome to OSM! Hope you enjoy mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176983976

Thank you for your contributions to the map, I have marked this changeset bad on OSMCha but note that doesn't mean the contributions aren't appreciated, they very much are, just that more work is needed here.

Love that you mapped the pavements! I've been doing that in my local area as well, Have a look around the Manor area for some examples if you want. When mapping sidewalks make sure to connect them to the road either using `footway=link` with `barrier=kerb` or using crossings with similar `barrier=kerb` tags on either side. I've added these for this section of road so feel free to look at that as an example.

Splitting the terraces up is really good work and makes the information much more useful! When you have many segments like that don't try to align them all by hand, I'm impressed you got it even close to straight using iD like that. You can instead select them all and square them all using the "q" key while they're selected.

Other than that looks all good! Feel free to reply here or message me if you have any questions and best of luck mapping!

Also if you happen to live in the area the app Street Complete is excellent for surveying and we really need more on the ground data in Sheffield!

Heyo! Thank you for adding to the map in Sheffield!

Welcome to OSM and thank you for making the map better!
If you're on android another worthwhile app for surveying is StreetComplete.

Thanks for updating this, I've since mapped all the buildings in this area using Esri.

Yes, I set the offset in JOSM using the existing data to align things as the project instructed contributors not to fix widespread alignment issues.

Bing imagery is not ground truth and there are GPS traces in the area that suggest the road is where the data was.

No worries, glad to hear! Was going a bit insane trying to find out what was wrong.

Thanks for the addition to the map!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175282166

Verified this as a good change but note that the tag "name=*" is generally for the signed or established name for a feature, not the general name for it. Unless the area is literally called "site" this name tag should be removed.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175275157

TY for adding the paths! Noticed they're not connected to each other and they don't seem to connect to any of the other paths. Is that intentional?

It leaves way/1454696669 entirely disconnected.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175283413

Edits look good! Thank you for adding this information! And welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175113708

Looks good! Just for future reference if you visit a site to confirm info you can list that as "survey" in the sources section for the changeset which is more standardized on OSM even though people will 100% know what "site visit" means. You also don't need to list the sources in the comment if they're listed in the sources tag for the changeset.

Thank you for improving the map! And welcome to OSM! :D
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175117521

Looks mostly good! Thank you for mapping some addresses in the new development!

Only thing I noticed was construction=footway being changed to construction=detatched which isn't a documented tag for a highway=construction way. What was the goal there?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175119944

Looks good aside from this building: way/1256346261
It seems to have gotten smaller and less accurate to the full shape of the building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175239873

Oh also when mapping buildings in iD editor, you can use the "q" key to square them up.