Loving the detailed improvements to platforms! TYSM for adding this data to the map!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175197033

Nice, I've copied over all the old tags from the previous recycling center as I assume it's going to recycle roughly the same stuff and deleted the old one.

The reason you couldn't delete it is because it had a wikidata tag, If you need to delete something like that in future delete the wikidata tag first and then you'll be able to delete the way just fine.

Thank you for taking the time to reply on this and keeping the map up to date!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175199802

Noticed this changeset deletes a random tree a ways north of the building, is this intentional?

Other than that looks all good, nice building refinement!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175238429

Great work on the mapping! I noticed the addition of name=James house on the building and another name tag on the service road leading to it.

Just a note on tagging convention: The name tag should only be used for a feature's publicly known, established, or signed name. Private residence names are generally not added unless the house is a local landmark or has a sign posted for its name (like "The Old Mill House").

BCNorwich has already gone in and tweaked the geometry so no need to worry about that but for future building mapping you can use the "q" hotkey to square the corners on any buildings.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175078432

Thank you for adding to the map, though it's usually not advisable to disclose your home address via changeset on OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175077889

Seems like it might be a shop=pet rather than a supermarket but otherwise great!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175174714

This changeset seems to disconnect a few different foot-ways that seem to still be present based on the satellite imagery.
What was the goal with this changeset?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175175036

TY for the improvements to the map!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175176573

Looks good!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175193451

Would be good to know which imagery you used for this edit. Currently it's listed as bing which doesn't show any of the features you've mapped.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175195362

Looks good though it does seem like you've potentially mapped your home address.
I've mapped a few of the buildings around this, would love to get addresses for them as well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175196221

It looks to be roughly in the same place based on the source you've provided, has it moved over to the next space over?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175199802

Thank you for contributing to the map!

Just a few minor notes but I wanna be clear, the changeset is all good. When mapping a building you should try and position the outline where the foot of the building is, not where the roof is on the satellite imagery.
Secondly you can square corners of your areas using the "q" hotkey on iD which helps when mapping buildings.

Best of luck with mapping and feel free to reach out with any questions.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175201267

Looks good! Thank you for making the map better! :D
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175203516

Hello and thank you for contributing to the map!

I've marked the changeset as bad as I don't think you've mapped the Perrotin London correctly but the information added is still very useful to the map.

Would you be able to clarify where the Perrotin London Gallery is? I'm guessing it's underground, underneath the sidewalk, with access from the street/hotel? It might be worth mapping as a single node rather than as a geometry as it can get pretty complex to map in situations like that. Equally feel free to reply on here if you'd like help improving how this is currently mapped.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175205782

Just reviewed your changeset and it looks good! Thank you for contributing to the map!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175215320

Noticed your account has just started editing the map. Thank you for making the map better and welcome to OSM!

If you end up adding more addresses and alike, for what I assume is your local area, I recommend using Street Complete (https://streetcomplete.app/) for surveying if you have an android phone as it's much faster than the iD editor for surveying purposes.

Hello!
Just reviewing this changeset and it looks really good! Thank you for making the map better! Just wanted to note that you deleted a building (way/1333464887) and it's associated tags and replaced it with another building (way/1442942272) with seemingly less information. I unfortunately cannot speak cymraeg so have no idea if the information was relevant. If you'd be able to double check that it'd be ace! In future it's also a good idea to delete the tags on a building and leave the object there so others can go back and check the history of the object.
Best of luck mapping!
- Canopy Falls
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173432896

That would be my guess. These cycle routes like NCN67 seem a little pointless. They often just kick cyclists out into roads with little to no notice and I don't know if it's worth actually keeping them mapped. This one here doesn't even have a lowered kerb for cyclists if memory serves me correctly. You're expected to just kinda wing it to get onto Stone Lane.
Thank you for repairing the relationship!

Hello Andy!
Thank you for catching this! I think I got distracted midway through adding pavement here. I've connected this up and added a marked crossing further down the road:
changeset/172985323

I want to survey this area more on foot and upload imagery to Mappillary before changing too much else due to the tree cover so I've left the footpath connections across the road even though they're incorrect. Lemme know if there's anything else that needs adding or changing!