BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 36550390 | almost 10 years ago | Regarding the northern feature. Not quite finished I think, and not enough info to guess what was intended. |
| 36449666 | almost 10 years ago | Added building, driveway and a bit more info. |
| 36547699 | almost 10 years ago | Hi, with respect I think this changeset is also a mistake. It certainly has no relevance to the OSM database and unless you can explain it it should be removed, Regards |
| 36423611 | almost 10 years ago | Hello, If access through the gates to Royal Close and Collinson place is access=private then I would expect the roads beyond the gates to also be access=private. So the two ways should be tagged a such. Regards |
| 36544552 | almost 10 years ago | Hi, no problem, glad to help. Couple of good guides for building outlines are:- https://www.mapbox.com/blog/fast-building-tracing/
|
| 36447214 | almost 10 years ago | Hi, just wanted to let you know you've somehow dragged several nodes and made self intersections on the outline of the construction land. Do you want to redraw it or shall I try to revert the changes. |
| 35935498 | almost 10 years ago | Are the areas tagged as heath really heath lands? As far as I am aware these are fells and should be tagged natural=fell. |
| 35285182 | almost 10 years ago | Hi, surely the cycleway going through buildings from Leighfield Road is not supposed to duplicate the foot-way. Is it meant to be a shared cycle/foot way? |
| 35736613 | about 10 years ago | Quite a lot of mistakes made here on the forest areas. Lots of single untagged nodes all over the place. looks like a lot of parts of areas have been deleted. |
| 35879582 | about 10 years ago | Thank you for pointing this out.
|
| 35776530 | about 10 years ago | I have tweaked your new school area and removed the duplicate school area keeping all relevant tags on the one area. |
| 35776571 | about 10 years ago | I have redrawn the areas because you inadvertently had several self intersections and had moved the outlines of adjacent areas/buildings. I have also removed the building, car park and roads you inadvertently left under the new building. |
| 35776591 | about 10 years ago | I have deleted the duplicate car park area and placed all relevant tags including your new name tag on the one area. |
| 35776610 | about 10 years ago | You only need one amenity=school tag for the school. I have removed the two or three extra ones. When several buildings/areas make up a school it's usual to place all the main tags on the overall area which you have done. |
| 20484369 | about 10 years ago | RILD building does not look right and there is a self intersection of the outline. |
| 35534336 | about 10 years ago | From the Bing image these are buildings but none are tagged as buildings. The buildings should be conventionally tagged so that they can be rendered properly.
|
| 35547378 | about 10 years ago | From the Bing image these are buildings but none are tagged as buildings. The buildings should be conventionally tagged so that they can be rendered properly. |
| 35531074 | about 10 years ago | From the Bing image these are buildings but none are tagged as buildings. Also there are hundreds of single untagged node beneath the building nodes.
|
| 35263794 | about 10 years ago | Duplicate section of roundabout :- Way: 220524955
|
| 34489233 | about 10 years ago | Hello, I can't see where anything was fixed after your last edit. But I can only comment on what was there when I looked at correcting a routing problem. I found that way/54240537 was disconnected from way/54110777 at node/3776403450 , the two way end nodes shared the same position exactly (one on-top of the other, coordinates the same). Thus looking as if the two ways were one. Fact was the two ways were discontinuous, (thus routeing from one way to the other was disrupted). I fixed the problem by merging the two end nodes, all is OK now.
|