OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
37570774 almost 10 years ago

Hi, from your website I think you have placed this POI in the wrong place. I have corrected the opening times to conform with OpenStreetMap practices. Regards

37557926 almost 10 years ago

Is it really one way, I can't see anything to suggest this from Bishops way junction.

37537619 almost 10 years ago

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see that there is no physical presence of the stated company at the point you have mapped inside the park Islington Green.
As such this feature is not verifiable on the ground at that point, it is therefore a fiction at that point. Would you like to move it to its correct position and also give a real address that can be verified please. Otherwise the feature should be removed.
Thanks and Regards.

37432796 almost 10 years ago

Hi, I removed duplicate features. A few descriptive nodes inside of areas with the same description, (pub, hospital and car shop).

37273085 almost 10 years ago

Hi, your change-set added numerous untagged ways duplicating existing ways. I think you must have inadvertently done this so I have reverted the additions. The map is now back as it was so no harm done. Please read up a bit before adding features to the map. Your editing is to a live map and it's very easy to mess things up.

Were you intending to add a cottage to the map? If so can I assist in any way?

Regards Bernard

37191391 almost 10 years ago

Hi, There are now two outlines for the park, and one outline duplicates itself by going round twice. so in fact three circuits of the park in total. May I also suggest that the park does not extend to the center line of the surrounding roads and that it should be mapped to it's physical boundary. Regards.

37169742 almost 10 years ago

Don't know if reverting is possible in iD editor so I've reverted the deletion in with the JOSM editor.
Building is now back as it was with all tags, you can now start again with your modifications. Good luck.
PS I forgot to say "Welcome to OpenStreetMap".

37169742 almost 10 years ago

Hi, The building is still there so there was no need to remove it. Someone might come along and put it back. So the best thing to do is remove all detail specific to the business and then put on a note=vacant tag or note=music shop closed now shop unknown.

37108674 almost 10 years ago

Many Thanks, looks good now.

37108674 almost 10 years ago

There are many added ways mostly duplicated and untagged. A lot connecting to existing features. Unfortunately I have made a couple of corrections before realising the extent of the problem. Would it be best to revert this changeset? Not by me as there are to many conflicts.

37023460 almost 10 years ago

Can the Dream Shed be verified on the ground by anyone visiting the site? If not then it should not be included on OSM.
If it is in fact a shed then it should be tagged building=shed and the name should be the actual proper name.

36604305 almost 10 years ago

With respect, moorland should be tagged as moorland, and not be tagged as heath to suit the renderer even if it looks wrong. To do such tagging is to corrupt the database.

36691361 almost 10 years ago

relation/2956938

36691361 almost 10 years ago

Please don't forget this is a live map and not really the place to test out ideas. There is already a Crossrail route relation :- #2956938

25145736 almost 10 years ago

Just found out again that I can't reply to the email notification, should be a warning!!
Hello Robert,
I haven't been that way for a while but I do remember the path. There are a few GPS traces for the way. The section of wide grassy track between the field and the hedge/ditch has been permissively used as bridleway for years. This is from Shelton FP 1 to Shelton Spot or The Spot highway U76132. The confusion is that a few years ago someone erected fingerposts near to where the BR goes across the common indicating this way as a RoW instead of the correct BR27 route.
So to recap as I recall the tags should be for permissive bridleway, therefore permissive horse and foot use.

By the way Morningthorpe Green is open access land, I've just been trying to determine if the access land goes over to include this track.
Regards
Bernard

36622471 almost 10 years ago

Hi, correct.
I had seen your query about these comments and wondered if I would get notification by commenting on a comment. I didn't.
What I would like is notification of, or a way to get a list of, the comments I make on other folks changesets.

36622471 almost 10 years ago

second test

36622471 almost 10 years ago

Test comment

36550390 almost 10 years ago

Hi, the northern of the two features, Way: 391197182 just tagged as area, outline also has self intersection.
way/391197182

36570356 almost 10 years ago

Hi, are the tags on Way: 238287403 correct? I wondered why a helipad was included in a highway=footway area.