Please try and keep the history (osm.wiki/Keep_the_history). Rather than deleting something and "rebuilding" it, it is often better to modify what already exists. It makes it much easier for people to review your changes and also investigate the history of an object (some of the ways you deleted have history going back 7+ years)

Hi, the bus stops needn't go on the footpaths. It is fine to keep them where the pole is (usually by the tactile paving)

Hi, I have removed that one. It may take some time to show on the map due to browser cache.

Hi,

In this situation the crossing tag should have been removed rather than the node itself as it was part of a building way.

I've restored the building geometry in changeset/175133725

Instead of using oneway=-1 you can simply reverse the way. oneway=yes is much more intuitive than oneway=-1

oneway=-1

You've mapped some of these buildings as triangles which is incorrect. Most of these buildings should be rectangular. You should also press "Q" after drawing a building to orthagonalise its shape.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174100154

Thanks for the tip, but it was slightly more complicated than that. I had to disconnect a node (ALT+J) from a few ways and one I couldn't do because I had to undelete a deleted node as well (I found a partial revert easier for that). Normal dragged nodes are easy enough to restore their location without a revert, I agree :)

What is this untagged way meant to be way/1446647689 and is this bus route (relation/16087037) meant to route over it?

Sorry, this was mean to be a comment for this changeset: changeset/174135730

The correct role for the bus stop in the route relation is "platform" rather than "bus_stop", and it should be ordered rather than appended to the bottom of the route

Here, you also added the stops to the route masters (osm.wiki/Relation:route_master). This is incorrect, as the route masters should only have members of the route variants on that line

I've reverted the problematic changes in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174088754.

Please take care not to accidentally drag and merge nodes

This needs to be reverted. Several dragged nodes, one with no obvious fix (deleted nodes, weird merges).

Reverting this changeset alone generates conflicts I couldn't resolve, so someone else will have to fix this.

As described in the other changeset, the stop positions are currently not ordered properly.

Hi, thanks for adding the stop positions. Just a heads up, the order of the stops, platforms, and ways in the route relations matter. osm.wiki/Relation:route

Currently, both of the routes you added a stop to have the stop as the last member. It should be ordered, from the top, in order of the railway stops and platforms, then the railway ways in order of the route.

So, for instance; Flinders Street => Mernda route, the Keon Park stop should come directly after Ruthven stop and platform.

relation/14024884
relation/14024885

Please don't connect building nodes to the SRL (way/1003899336/history/36)

The driveway and footpath should have a connecting node at the intersection of the ways

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

In this changeset you've added a building that shares nodes with the SRL East way.

way/1446183081/history/1

As the buildings on the surface do not connect to or are attached to an underground construction way in anyway, they should not share nodes with each other.

I've removed the nodes from the SRL in changeset/173955146.

Please take care not to attach buildings nodes to the SRL in future.

Also, if you can contact the smart-cities-transport-project-71 organiser and inform them that some mappers keep adding nodes to the SRL, it would be much appreciated. I am unable to find the contact information of the organiser who's responsible for the mapping through the smartcitiestransport website without making an account.

The highway=* ways should have a connecting node at their intersection.

i.e. the service road and cycleway should be connected with a node at the intersection of both ways

The driveway should connect to the road in addition to the footpath