Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: John Mallinckrodt <ajm@csupomona.edu>*Date*: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:20:14 -0700

This agrees with a simple analysis based on nothing more than the orbital radius of GPS satellites:

Because the orbital radius is r = 26,600 km (≅ 4.17 R_e), the orbital speed is v = sqrt(GM_e/r) = 3.87 km/s.

The special relativistic effect causes GPS clocks to run SLOW by gamma – 1 ≅ (1/2)v^2/c^2 = (1/2)GM_e/rc^2 = 7.2 microsec/day.

The general relativistic effect causes GPS clocks to run FAST by delta phi/c^2 = GM_e/rc^2(r/R_e – 1) = 45.6 microsec/day.

Thus, the overall effect is that GPS clocks run fast by about 38 microsec/day. It's interesting to note that the general relativistic effect is by far the largest contributor and it's also interesting to note that the orbital radius at which the two effects cancel each other is r = 3/2 R_e.

John Mallinckrodt

Cal Poly Pomona

On Oct 30, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Bernard Cleyet wrote:

38 microseconds – discrepancy in GPS satellite time per day (compensated by clock speed) due to relativity

Microsecond - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bc finds the darndest things while googling.

_______________________________________________

Forum for Physics Educators

Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu

https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [Phys-l] relativity trivium***From:*Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>

**References**:**[Phys-l] relativity trivium***From:*Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Phys-l] How did Newton estimate the Gravitational constant?** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Phys-l] relativity trivium** - Previous by thread:
**[Phys-l] relativity trivium** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Phys-l] relativity trivium** - Index(es):