I cannot see any signing on the ground at this point. The path was created in 1977 so i wonder if anyone actually maintains it. Its a bit like the London Cycle Routes from the 1980s which have been added to OSM but in reality many simply don't exist any more.

The footpath along side the river joins a very overgrown pavement at the side of Chigwell Lane. There is a gate and a track from Chigwell Lane into the field, so I have added that. There is no way the Three Forests way should be joining the road here as its a fast main road with no safe crossing point. The only logical route is to head north to the Langston Road traffic lights, cross there and then come south along the footway on the est side of Chigwell Lane. I don't have any information to confirm what the correct route is.

My apologies for the slow response. I have been away for 2 months on a long cycle ride to Spain via France. The footway here is signed as shared use cycling and walking with the blue sign shown at #956 at the link you sent. So making it a cycleway is the classic tagging style which I had assumed is correct? For me a path is a much vaguer term and I often find people marking paths as yes for cycling even when there is no legal permission for this to happen. Happy to change this back if path is better in this case.

I was going by this source of info which shows the path as using the station footbridge to cross the railway. https://ldwa.org.uk/ldp/members/show_path.php?path_name=Kingfisher+Way
There is no foot crossing of the A507 road between the bus stops (it would be far too dangerous given speeds, there are no marking and no dropped kerb) so I removed that crossing and highlighted the road and station footbridge as the correct route. It doesn't use the footpath along the side of the A507 according to the source used. Hope that helps.
Adam

Thanks. Very happy to have this corrected.

Thanks for this. Someone on a disabled trike needs to challenge the legality of this as it's not fit for purpose at all.

Can I assume the spelling error has been corrected where made?

Thank you for fixing this.

Yes. Typo. I don't know how to find and correct this. The link goes to some computer code which doesn't appear to do anything (which may be as I've never seen this before.) Please change or give me a street location as there's lots of crossings in Leighton Buzzard. Thanks.

I have put the NCN 13 relation back on road as per the Sustrans info.

My error. I had to remove the relation to change something (I was adding crossings) and forgot to put it back. It's a very odd bit of map here as WWCT (formerly Sustrans) shows NCN13 as on road yet the map shows a cycleway next to the road, which I cannot find any evidence for, not least as there's no footway on Wash Road south side where this cycleway is showing as running. I need to go for a cycle ride here and see what is actually in place.

I'm not sure what exactly this is referring to. There are 4 bits of one way cycle path at the junction for Salmon Parade and Broadway. Is there something else here that I should not have removed?

Thank you. Part of the reason for doing the ride I did was to have a good explore of the route. There's more being done along the town centre road top left in this image. As it wasn't complete I didn't add it.

Quite possibly made an errir. Thank you for fixing this.

Thanks for this. I think I have fixed them all. It now all joins up.

Auto Shenanigans on YouTube has a video on that very topic!
https://youtu.be/fDrrL2l47s4?si=GJB3wiOgcrooCqVC

Apologies. Changed back as requested.

Yes, that makes sense although that relation needs editing. NCN61 ends officially at Rye House, not Hoddesdon. I'll have a go sorting that. Off to ride the route tomorrow.

A bit of context: Sustrans reviewed it's routes four years ago and set higher safety standards for traffic and accessibility. Routes which fail these tests have been deleted.

Should add this makes the mile post redundant. You can see the Sustrans official routes here: https://www.sustrans.org.uk/national-cycle-network/