I'm not sure what exactly this is referring to. There are 4 bits of one way cycle path at the junction for Salmon Parade and Broadway. Is there something else here that I should not have removed?

Thank you. Part of the reason for doing the ride I did was to have a good explore of the route. There's more being done along the town centre road top left in this image. As it wasn't complete I didn't add it.

Quite possibly made an errir. Thank you for fixing this.

Thanks for this. I think I have fixed them all. It now all joins up.

Auto Shenanigans on YouTube has a video on that very topic!
https://youtu.be/fDrrL2l47s4?si=GJB3wiOgcrooCqVC

Apologies. Changed back as requested.

Yes, that makes sense although that relation needs editing. NCN61 ends officially at Rye House, not Hoddesdon. I'll have a go sorting that. Off to ride the route tomorrow.

A bit of context: Sustrans reviewed it's routes four years ago and set higher safety standards for traffic and accessibility. Routes which fail these tests have been deleted.

Should add this makes the mile post redundant. You can see the Sustrans official routes here: https://www.sustrans.org.uk/national-cycle-network/

I've removed the incorrect highlight from the northern section of Station Road. I'm cycling here on Monday to add stick on signs where needed in my role as the local Sustrans Volunteer Coordinator.

The Sustrans info is the official route is south of the primary school via Ware station and Crane Mead, but also the section along side the canal up to the High Street Bridge. The tow path from High Street westwards has been delisted as it's very narrow with a very poor surface. The section from Station Road to Viaduct road needs to be removed which I will do.

Thanks. I hadn't realised this was an effect of my change.

I'm very happy for you to use your local knowledge to change this.

I don't remember where I got the info the most likely would be something like that for Bristol as I would have searched for something I hoped was definitive. I was trying to find surfaced routes to get me through the city as I recall a lot of cycleways missing any surface info (and that then makes Ride with GPS which I use for planning reject the route). My logic for making things foot and cycleway is that's what I see in most parts of OCM and reflects the signing usually with a blue circle showing pedestrians and cycles. When you add cycle and foot path it prompts you to say if segregated or not, so clear if it's shared use or not. see highway=cycleway. This doesn't suggest the use of "pavement". footway=sidewalk (which is the information for Pavement) doesn't make this any clearer other than to say "Generally any walkway running parallel to the road, which provides an alternative method of travel along the road for pedestrians is considered a sidewalk." which is to me not primarily about cycling. I guess both can be used and it may not matter greatly? Happy to be corrected.

Thank you!

I hope I now have set this correctly using GB:nsl_single for the 60mph road sections and sign for the 30 mph section. Is that correct?

Apologies. I did not know this was required. When I edit I see a speed limit box and assumed adding the number here was enough. The max speed tags just seem to repeat that information so what difference does it make? Why are they needed? Thanks

You can see the NCN2 signs here clearly showing that the cycle route is off road and going around the roundabout on the shared use footway to the south and then west. https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=50.708338%7E-2.422797&lvl=17.9&pi=-17.5&style=x&dir=87.6

https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=51.751265%7E-0.22522&lvl=17.9&pi=-10.2&style=x&dir=38.4

Apologies.

Thank you. It's a shame there's no safe cycle path to the east to join up with the backstreets route to the Woolwich Ferry.