Dear Ferchino83,

in the previous block we had asked you to stop adding “junction=yes” to arbitrary junctions without reason, which also removed large numbers of traffic lights from those junctions.

We also asked you to provide meaningful changeset comments, and to explain what the source of things that you are adding/changing is.

Though you have apologised in changeset/66661564, I find you continuing adding the junction tag, although user chachafish had removed it before. We call this an ‘edit=war’ and cannot tolerate it, as it creates more work for your fellow local users and the Data Working Group. Example: node/2802286301/history

In the previous 51 changesets, you repeat the changeset comment “Reparando calles y nombres de vías eliminadas por Polarbear-repair y chachafish”, i.e. falsely blaming other users of doing damage. You also use that comment for edits that do not change road names but add the junction tag.

I had asked you in changeset/66858191 to stop that. In particular, I have not touched any of your edits, while chachafish has reverted your damage to traffic lights. You still continue.

Reverting can always cause some collateral damage, in particular when one changeset mixes different types of changes. This does not allow to include personalised blaming in the comments.

As you are adding/changing lots of street names, I ask you again: What is the source of those names? We must ensure OSM only takes input from non-copyrightes sources. You must not copy these names from other maps.

Kind regards
Polarbear

Member of the Data Working Group