five years ago you were made aware of our import guidelines, but two weeks ago you conducted another import in Nepal that was fraught with problems, and you ignored community attempts to contact you about it. I am therefore reverting your OCHA place name import in Nepal.
The import suffers from:
(a) lack of discussion with the community or documentation
(c) introducing countless place node duplicates (lack of conflation with existing data), and very bad positional accuracy (errors of hundreds of meters are not uncommon)
(d) using tags derived from metadata of the source shape file which are undocumented or pointless (various is_in tags, “hlcit:code”, “unocha:pcode”, “unocha:vil_code”, “unocha:vname”)
These things should be fixed before you attempt another import; please discuss on the imports mailing list.
OSMF Data Working Group