Hi - based on the road design here, I believe this segment should not be one-way, which is why I removed your initial tag. Traffic can use this segment of road to travel southbound to Schmidt Lake Road.

Hi - thanks for your edits! Note that the access=no tag you've added here implies that access is not allowed for any modes of transport (e.g. car, foot). If trucks are not allowed on these road segments, you can use the hgv=no tag to indicate that (or better - use hgv=designated on the route they are supported to use). Here are some helpful links:
hgv=*
osm.wiki/MUTCD/R#R14:_Truck_Routes

Hey - prior to removing these ways I asked other local mappers for their opinion regarding 'proposed' ways. The general consensus was that 'highway/railway=proposed' ways are not appropriate for OSM as they are not verifiable on the ground, and as you mentioned, the route is subject to change. The 'proposed' value itself is a disputed subject on OSM (see osm.wiki/Talk:Key:proposed#Verifiable? and highway=proposed)

Once construction starts, it would be valid to add the ways as railway=construction.

If you disagree, you are welcome to join the OpenStreetMap Slack #local-minnesota channel and voice your opinion. This changeset (and/or 134796569) can be reverted if there is agreement with others.

Hi craigcilley - you requested a review on this changeset. The modification to a footway looks correct, however, you should also remove the name of this way, assuming that the footpath itself does not have a name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134752674

Hi alk131, thanks for contributing to OSM. This changeset and other recent ones from you introduced some errors to the map. In particular, you've labeled a handful of forested areas as buildings. You can correct this by using the natural=wood tag on those areas instead.

Hi kobejim2,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. There are a handful of errors in this changeset and other recent ones from you, so I wanted to make you aware of the mapping guidelines for golf courses in OSM. This (leisure=golf_course) wiki page will be a helpful reference and will explain best practices and common mistakes. Please give it a read before you continue mapping golf courses.

The most common mistake I saw here was applying the name= tag to every object you mapped (e.g. "#17 Fairway" or "Willow Tree"). This is an incorrect use of the tag - in general the name tag should only be used if there is an official or common name for the object (like the name of the golf course for example). I've gone ahead and fixed most of the mistakes here at Shamrock Golf Course, but again, please give the wiki a read if you plan to continue mapping (which I hope you do!)

Oops, my bad. I will get those fixed up. Thanks for noticing!

Hi Comander Soren! Thanks for contributing! Your alignment and intersection modification look good. Regarding the naming you are worried about, I see that you modified the street north of 289th Ave from 151st St to 292nd Ave. Does the road change names as it crosses 289th?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114071725

Hi thedashcunning! Thanks for contributing! Looks like you may have accidentally modified the name of a section of 109th Ave Northeast to 109th Court Northeast
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114312125

Hey torkteam23! Thanks for contributing! Just a quick tip when adding footways - when the footpath naturally connects to a road, it is usually best to connect the path to a node on the road. This helps with routing and ensures that the footpaths don't end up as a 'routing island' (i.e. they don't connect to anything else). For example, in this changeset, I would connect the north paths to the turning circle nodes of 72nd Ave and Deerwood Ln, connect the east path to the curve between Deerwood Ln and 70th Place, and finally connect the west path to the service road in the parking lot.

Thanks again for your contributions! It is nice to have another active mapper working on the Maple Grove area :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113951843