OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
165288771 8 months ago

(deleted node/5156973643 because it's a duplicate of node/5156973642)

165174517 8 months ago

I've reported it to https://www.gov.pl/web/kmpsp-bydgoszcz/dane-kontaktowe

165174474 8 months ago

I've reported all of them to https://www.gov.pl/web/kmpsp-bydgoszcz/dane-kontaktowe

163865658 9 months ago

Well, yeah, hard (as of March 20th). Regarding source, as you can see in this changeset, `source=survey` and imagery_used=.gpx data file` (my own track when I went there). I've also mapped barriers with geolocated photos.

Most of the path I've tagged with `trail_visibility=bad` and one part is even `sac_scale=alpine_hiking` as you have to even climb almost vertical wall - the path are there though (mostly). And yeah, plenty of `barrier=log` throughout.

164667313 9 months ago

If the path actually exists, regardless if it's overgrown it should stay on the map, perhaps tagged with `overgrown=yes` or `trail_visibility=...`. I'm completely fine with that. I've just removed it then cause I just didn't see it at all, it just seem to end for me from the point I've removed it.

Some side notes: looking at Geoportal the land plot that's owned by PZM (I assume) starts about 13m from the river, so any path in that area is almost certainly public.

> this path near PZM near Brda River is the only legal option to go through because it's forbidden to go by PZM's tracks.

well, not entirely, since the land is not entirely surrounded by fence you legally can go there and stay until someone tells you to go away (https://repozytorium.kul.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/40364972-b5aa-47f6-8474-f6a5bb4b647a/content)

164667313 9 months ago

this recording is from February 26th, I was there on March 26th and it was so overgrown it wasn't visible at all