I am having second thoughts about the *names* of these trails. I wonder if they are surveyable on the ground. If not, maybe the names need removing. If they are surveyable, some abbreviations might need expanding ("McQueen Lk Blue XC Tr").

The DWG is tracking this in Ticket#2025121810000281. The deletions are against OSM's rules and have been rightfully reverted. Repeated deletion of these tracks violates our terms and will be considered vandalism.

looks legit

These are mobile to a certain degree, right? And what you have mapped here is their configuration on whichever date the aerial imagery has been taken? Does that make sense? Is that not like mapping the location of an airport bus?

Instead of deleting buildings and then re-drawing them, you might use the JOSM "modify geometry" tool to move them to the right place.

Dear BrianKarani, in this changeset you have deleted a lot of buildings and then re-drawn them. The JOSM editor that you are using has an edit mode that allows you to correct the geometry of existing objects, rather than deleting them. That way, the history (Object initially created by user X, then improved by user Y) remains intact. Please consider using that in the future.

Also, please write changeset comments that are understandable by the average OSM community member - nobody outside a small circle of people knows what "#hotosm-project-37527" is supposed to mean ;)

Dear Torgeir123, I have reverted your recent edits because they seem to have accidentally deleted some data.

Dear Nguyen Quang 12178, there are a couple of problems with your contributions to OSM:
1. Instead of putting a "." in the changeset comment field, please add a meaningful sentence that describes to other humans what you have done.
2. Also please fill out the source field - you have named schools across the country so it seems unlikely that you simply happen to know them all.
3. When adding a school please use the "amenity=school" tag, not (just) "building=school".
4. The name of the school should be JUST the name of the school. The number of stories or the word "school" do not belong in the name field. Put the number of stories in the "Levels" field which appears just below the name field in the editor.
5. If the school as an interior courtyard like this one, you have to construct a "multipolygon" object in the editor to put the hole into the building.
Thank you for your attention and happy mapping!

reverted

Hello Rdeipenau, in this changeset you have deleted 200 roads and the only comment you offered about this was "05/12/25". This is not sufficient; a deletion like that requires an explanation why these features have gone (for example "the whole area has been bulldozed to make room for a spaceport" or so). You can't just delete that amount of data without saying why. I have reverted the deletion. (DWG Ticket#2025120510000304)

PeterK2003, there is no legal basis for you to request the deletion of accurate data from our database. You might just as well request your driveway be deleted from Google imagery or from your county's GIS database. The fact that your driveway is private doesn't impact our right to record it (as a private driveway). Please stop trying to intimidate us with your cease-and-desist antics. I have reverted your latest deletions because they violate our terms of use which you accepted when signing up, and I have blocked your account to prevent you from further breaches of our terms. If you would like to know more about our mapping of private property, see osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

I have removed a number of non-constructive comments from user 3D打印 on this changeset. Please don't call each other names. I will also review Simon1595's recent edits with regard to damaging borders or deleting data in the border region. This is tracked as DWG Ticket#2025120410000271

regarding the replacing of "St." with "Saint" in place names, please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/st-stephen-new-brunswick-or-saint-stephen/130485 and participate in that discussion before you repeat this kind of edit.

Ich habe den POI gelöscht. OSM ist kein Dienstleister-Verzeichnis, und schon gar nicht eines für Dienstleister ohne konkrete und korrekte Adresse.

Ich bin jetzt im Kontakt mit der zuständigen Person bei NBB. Es besteht der Verdacht, dass einige unserer Daten unzulässig aus deren Leitungsinformationssystem übernommen sind. Wenn sich das als zutreffend herausstellt (und der/die Original-Mapper keine zulässige Quelle vorweisen können), müssen wir die Daten in OSM natürlich löschen. Aber ich warte da jetzt auf ein paar konkrete Beispiele, damit wir nachforschen können.

Hier ist Dir wohl ein Fehler passiert - Du hast lauter Straßen mit roof-Tags versehen ;) ich revertiere diese Änderung.

Ich habe die Änderungen jetzt alle revertiert und osm.org/user_blocks/18999

reverted, user block in osm.org/user_blocks/18998

This changeset has added a triangular and nonsensical landuse on top of an already existing landuse. If this was done manually, what were you thinking? If this was done by software, the software clearly is buggy.

Thank you to all involved in this discussion for not starting an edit war.