Dufekin, can you check the Rothrock State Forest relation change you made?
There are two indelpendent ways
included in the relation as outers. Is this an ongoing update, or should they be removed?
way/749109387
way/497498554

Gregg, can you relook at this changeset? Sidewalk has been merged with South Church Ave, the Convention Center relation is broken, crossing were put on landuse ways.

hi technogeek, the scrub relation/2592470 updated in this change is now unclosed. It also overlaps with wood areas. There is also over 1000 individual natural=tree, all with a height of 10 (not created by you). All of it seems like it needs some brush/tree trimming.

hi b1's, welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding/updating items. Hidden paths are always interesting. The end that goes to lot 2 should be connected to the highway for routing software. Have fun, keep mapping!

Parcanman, can you check
relation/14148356 and 9171816? seems like you might be trying to merge the two, but it doesn't look correct. 14148356 only has 1 way in it.

hi MC! welcome to osm. Abbreviations like Dr are expanded, to Drive in this case (not Doctor :-). I adjusted, and added road type and building outlines. Keep mapping, and have fun!

alikp, can you revisit this change. The service way is not attached to the other ways. It also looks like outdated imagery was used.

hi madiener, Charles River Reservoir relation is now broken. can you look into correcting? thx.

Hi madiener, looks like some of the points you removed were being used in the Red Wind Bay relation. It's now broken. Can you look into correcting? thx.

Good job! have fun and keep mapping :-)

Zee, this is a production system, please revert your test
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120754816

Zee, this is a production system, please revert your test
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120754718

hi madiener, this change also broke relation/14114335. Did you mean to delete this relation too? Also not sure why all the extra fields are included (like massgis:ARTICLE97). Can you investigate and correct?

kirbert, can you look at jeff davis relation, relation/1073784? it has a duplicate section, way/1058055373 and also Altamaha River way/137851366.

Yes, looks good. Thanks for correcting.

Ram,
can you look at the Bixton Rush Common ward relation (relation/14103909)? It's broken (not a complete ring). Looks like way/1040559077 should be used instead of Brixton Hill (way/4060864).

hi Ellie, check relation/135134,
way/668509175 looks to have been left in the relation, but should be removed. josm's validator found this, maybe it should be included in the due diligence?

hi IK, can you review your change?
Barrio Viejo relation/7058543, and relation/11859917 are now broken.

and since your are cleaning up things on things, check out these overlaps:
way/872829749
way/872829746
way/872829747

way/872829751
way/872829752
way/872829753

hi akuksouski, can you look at the lincoln square relation? looks like an extra section of west 60th is included.

mark, can you check your edit? looks like you deleted a section of birdseye road, and also a census boundary.