OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
121073243 over 3 years ago

Parcanman, can you check
relation/14148356 and 9171816? seems like you might be trying to merge the two, but it doesn't look correct. 14148356 only has 1 way in it.

120927419 over 3 years ago

hi MC! welcome to osm. Abbreviations like Dr are expanded, to Drive in this case (not Doctor :-). I adjusted, and added road type and building outlines. Keep mapping, and have fun!

117202065 over 3 years ago

alikp, can you revisit this change. The service way is not attached to the other ways. It also looks like outdated imagery was used.

120761978 over 3 years ago

hi madiener, Charles River Reservoir relation is now broken. can you look into correcting? thx.

120762312 over 3 years ago

Hi madiener, looks like some of the points you removed were being used in the Red Wind Bay relation. It's now broken. Can you look into correcting? thx.

120762397 over 3 years ago

Good job! have fun and keep mapping :-)

120754816 over 3 years ago

Zee, this is a production system, please revert your test
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120754816

120754718 over 3 years ago

Zee, this is a production system, please revert your test
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120754718

120651175 over 3 years ago

hi madiener, this change also broke relation/14114335. Did you mean to delete this relation too? Also not sure why all the extra fields are included (like massgis:ARTICLE97). Can you investigate and correct?

120656422 over 3 years ago

kirbert, can you look at jeff davis relation, relation/1073784? it has a duplicate section, way/1058055373 and also Altamaha River way/137851366.

120531240 over 3 years ago

Yes, looks good. Thanks for correcting.

120531240 over 3 years ago

Ram,
can you look at the Bixton Rush Common ward relation (relation/14103909)? It's broken (not a complete ring). Looks like way/1040559077 should be used instead of Brixton Hill (way/4060864).

120520752 over 3 years ago

hi Ellie, check relation/135134,
way/668509175 looks to have been left in the relation, but should be removed. josm's validator found this, maybe it should be included in the due diligence?

120189818 over 3 years ago

hi IK, can you review your change?
Barrio Viejo relation/7058543, and relation/11859917 are now broken.

and since your are cleaning up things on things, check out these overlaps:
way/872829749
way/872829746
way/872829747

way/872829751
way/872829752
way/872829753

119887458 over 3 years ago

hi akuksouski, can you look at the lincoln square relation? looks like an extra section of west 60th is included.

119952733 over 3 years ago

mark, can you check your edit? looks like you deleted a section of birdseye road, and also a census boundary.

118794331 over 3 years ago

jacob, several of these buildings are duplicates. seems like the info should be combined and trimed.

119089479 over 3 years ago

Can you look at the relation again, seems to still have extra members

119364635 over 3 years ago

hi skyb,
can you check village of harrison relatioin, the boundary is broken.
way/292129232 may be the extra section ?

118397486 over 3 years ago

Mr. M, the new farmland relation/13916979 is not closed (but is attached to the Banbury boundary). It may need some adjusting that could use your on the ground knowledge.