thanks for checking into our edits. I have created a track road https://osmcha.org/changesets/84271527/ based on the available imagery. I am not sure how the adjoining segment https://osmcha.org/changesets/40462604/ is tagged with the public foot path by the community member.

Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have accidentally modified the area tag. thanks for notifying this. please find the changeset for the reversion. going forward, i will be very cautious while adding new data to the osm and make sure to retain the existing features. always happy to learn from the community

Thanks for checking into our edits. i have added the private access based on the gate visible in the bing imagery. please let me know if it is contradicting with the local knowledge and needs to be modified. always happy to learn from the community

Hi naveenpf, Thanks for the response. we are delighted to be a part of #hotosm-project and looking for more opportunities to work with you soon.

This is the correct comment for this changeset.
Added unmaintained track road#MapWithAI & #osm.wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing

This is the correct comment for this changeset.
Added service road#MapWithAI & #osm.wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing

This is the correct comment for this changeset.
Added service road#MapWithAI & #osm.wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing

This is correct comment for this changeset.
Added service road#MapWithAI & #osm.wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing

This is correct comment for this changeset/90068315,
Added service road#MapWithAI & #osm.wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing

This is the correct comment for this changeset,
Added service road #MapWithAI & #osm.wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing

This is the correct comment for this changeset/90227693 - added service road#MapWithAI & #osm.wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing

Thanks for checking it on our edits. I have enabled all the imagery to check its availability in the osm and make necessary changes. All the enabled sources are auto populated while saving the edits. Apologies, I have not modified the sources before saving the edits. thanks for the suggestions. going forward, i will be modifying the sources used accordingly. always happy to learn from the community

thanks for checking into our edits. I have cross verified all the available resources before making the edits. It was observed that the osm is auto-populating all the toggled imagery as resource used irrespective of the actual presence in that vicinity. i have passed on this information to our supervisor. we will perform the necessary deep dive and make sure to incorporate your suggestions in our future edits. once again, thanks for the valuable feedback. always happy to learn from the community

Hi Svalbard,
Thanks for your attention to my changeset. It’s a mistake from my end as I was confused with that entry/exits to the entity from the aerial imagery. You can verify the suggested modifications in the changeset(81253530). Always happy to learn from your feedback.
Regards
Wellasus

Hi trigpoint,

Thanks for suggestion given related to barriers.Will take this learning and use it for the further edits.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
wellasus.

Hi trigpoint,

Thanks for looking into my edit. Added barrier=yes as wasn't sure about the what type of the barrier it is. Made the edit has per the OSM Wiki(barrier=*). Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
wellasus.

Hi ndm,

Thanks for looking into my edit. It was an honest mistake. Will take this as learning and use for the further edits. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
lasushe.