Hi, I have no idea who wrote that page. I used information from the user and verified it on that page (as I remember). Sorry for any problems, but I always try to verify my edits.

Asking again,
what is the source of your edits? You definitely cant see road clasees on ortophoto!

I understand it. I'm just say that on page route=via%20ferrata?uselang=en-GB
via_ferrata_scale is listed as useful in route=via_ferrata relation.
I removed it from the relation.
changeset/188163845

According to wiki, it can be used on route [route=via%20ferrata?uselang=en-GB ].
But the page about the scale itself says that it cannot be used on route (as you said). So I’m a bit confused. Delete the scale if you think its better, but the wiki is not clear about it.

"uprava chyb" opravdu není vhodným komentářem. Pokud je změna číslování někde zveřejněna, stačí uvést třeba "I/3 -> II/603 (viz odkaz)" nebo tak něco.

Dobrý den,
z jakého zdroje máte informaci, že se silnice I/3 změnila na II/603? Mám pocit, že jsem toto s vámi již řešil, je opravdu tak těžké uvést zdroje změny do changesetu? Takto se to jeví jen jako ničím nepodložená změna od stolu.
Prosím tedy o informaci kde je tato změna číslování uvedena (Mapy.com nejsou relevantním zdrojem). V opačném případě budu nucen provést revert.

Sorry for huge changeset, edited areas were:
osm.org/#map=19/32.726546/-17.124909
and
osm.org/#map=16/38.03568/12.96597

Actually look rebuilt (or similar). Probably there is a museum and the building doesn't serve as church anymore.
I had no idea how to tag it, but removing amenity=place_of_worship would be probably a good move.

Hi, I think it is not. Can you please change it more suitable tag? I'm not sure about historic=ruins (so good for a ruin).
Thanks

Thanks, definitely was a mistake

Sry, I got it: it opens after MIUT and only for Fri-Sun for some time. After it will be full-week-opened.

Thanks, there is also written "Initial access likely Friday to Sunday". Is that mean that the opening is in this weekend?

Hi,
I'm not sure, if this route will be reopened as oneway? Or is it open as oneway now and in the end of April it will be fully opened?
I'm writting it because few of our user reported, that the route is opened now (as oneway).
Thanks for clarification.

Ale jakoby je fakt divné, že na tom nájezdu není vůbec nic, přitom by tam stačil zákaz odbočení.

Nejsem si jistý, ale tady [https://maps.app.goo.gl/Aiqm5fDnQLBs8oAW6] je podle mě vidět zákazová značka (dodatková tabulka vidět není).
Každopádně na tom dálničním nájezdu žádná značka asi není.

If you are talking about this [way/134068954/history], please look at the history (other ways from you changeset [changeset/181186182] has similar history):
It was firstly tagged as drain
Then you changed it to canal
I changed it back to drain
You now changed it to stream (which I find correct, at least from few examples I looked at).

I'm confused. About what are you talking as "i adjusted thousand of waterways=stream that you wrongly tagged as waterways=drain with usage=irrigation"?

Thanks.
About the streams: I didn't come up with that tagging. I just redrawn the geometry and used the same tags that were used before. It is a question whether levadas are streams or drains (or what). Or are you talking about something else?

Hi, I'm happy that bus routes are going to be mapped precisely. But there is nothing about highway=bus_stop in the provided link nor not using this tag.
Is there any reason of not using the highway=bus_stop?

In the PTv2, there is written "This proposal does not replace, deprecate or obsolete the already existing and well known tags.". Which I understand that there is no reason to delete the "old" tags such as bus_stop.