OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
40303747 over 9 years ago

Hi Matthew,

I've seen you mapped some buildings with additional tags like museum, post_office and so ...

Please can you elaborate these tagings a bit more, here.
I mean, do you have additional informations about these buildings or something !? ... what is your source ...?

38515056 almost 10 years ago

Sorry. Again comment and source should be:

source=gps/ppp; imagery provided by Bing.

Comment:
gps survey, bicycle, surveying local hiking trails

37364908 almost 10 years ago

Hi GerdP,

Yes, you're right, was a typo. Josm autocompletion ... again. Sorry.

36944648 almost 10 years ago

Sorry - again wrong comment and source:
comment: #hotosm-afghanistan-eq-1263
and source: MapBox, no offset

35674539 about 10 years ago

Darned - again: Wrong comment of it should be:
#hotosm-afghanistan-eq-1263

Btw. the new added highways -> classification needs to be checked. I try to guess it from appearance in the sat imagery -> compared with already mapped roads ...

Source is also worng: it was the imagery provided by MapBox as it is - no offset

Sorry.

24129630 about 10 years ago

Yes, Thanx - you're right. It was an autocomplete "typo" :-) .

34497950 over 10 years ago

Sorry, again. Wrong comment. It should be:
#coquimbo #hot-project-1198
and source was only the imagery provided by Bing.

34498140 over 10 years ago

Sorry, again. Wrong comment. It should be:
#coquimbo #hot-project-1198
and source was only the imagery provided by Bing.

34452338 over 10 years ago

Sorry, again. Wrong comment. It should be:
#coquimbo #hot-project-1198
and source was only the imagery provided by Bing.

34257772 over 10 years ago

Sorry wrong comment.
Should be:
#coquimbo #hot-project-1198
and source:
Bing imagery

33262027 over 10 years ago

Sorry wrong source tag: Of course it should be only: adjusted Bing imagery

32147536 over 10 years ago

Sorry wrong changeset comment!
It should be:
#hotosm-nepal-earthquake-1043

And source is:
Bing Imagery; no offset

26523778 about 11 years ago

Not sure this really classifies as an "isolated_dwelling"?