Der "noerdliche" teil sollte aktuell ok sein. Ueberprueft werden muesste aber wie weit der suedlichen teil des "Kleines Mostwaelchen Wegs" noch richtung norden "genutzt" werden kann. Habe das einfach nur extrapoliert (soweit ich es sehen koennte) - ist wirklich gefaehrlich da!
Muesste sich nochmal jemand vorsichtig von der suedseite her ansehen. ... war da vor ein paar tagen erst wieder hatte das aber leider nicht mehr auf den schirm ...

Sorry, I forgot.
.... gnss (rtk/sapos), bicycle, survey

Hi,

die survey Methode

Thanks for noticing!
Sorry, my bad - that was a split operation that went wrong without realizing it... Fixed it.

Sorry. Ja, sehe da auch keinen sinn.
Denke nicht das das so beabsichtigt war.
Selbst wenn sich etwas an der "smoothness" geaendert haette^1 - haette ich das normal einfach angepasst....

(^1 Ist aber jetzt schon wieder zu lange her...)

I actually don't see a reason for the fixme=yes ...
In the currently available imagery, it looks no more or less "uncertain" than many of the objects mapped in the area...

Sorry, wrong changeset comment.
Should be:
gnss (rtk/sapos), bicycle, survey

Sorry, not intentional. Probably didn't even notice the previous used sources .. ?
Always try to use the most up-to-date (by timestamp) sources (of course also considering "resolution", "accuracy" ...)

Thanks for the feedback. What information are you missing, for example? (Can't think of something useful to add as a comment right now ...)

hi,
writing here from my new account.

I took a look at it.

Would it be ok if I simply delete my (jaldhaka) old mappings (with version 1) and create a new building outline? This is usually easier than adapting the existing ones. The disadvantage would be that the history of the edits would then be somewhat more complex to understand. I would use ESRI as source - as is!?

gnss (rtk/sapos), bicycle, survey

> du hast hier bei diversen Schneisen die highway-Werte entfernt. Ich habe einige auf Luftbildern geprüft, die klar begeh- oder gar befahrbar für die Forstwirtschaft sind.

Sorry, but do I really have to explain this? ... better not.

> note/3641865

Yes, one of the new "arrow" ht's.
That's work in progress...
So far waited for the logging in the conifer forest parts in this area to be finished... but as it looks the ht is probably not affected by this anyway.

If you think it's appropriate (I think it is), please do so.

If I get questions from the hunter I can refer him to you ;-)

Yes, That is a cutline that is currently maintained because of the hunting.

Probably!? But I'm not sure why that's there in the first place....

Sorry wrong changset comment. Should be:
#hotosm-project-10160 #liga-zambia

wrong changeset comment ...

#hotosm-project-8723 #cycloneAmphan

Sorry wrong changeset commert - should be:

#hotosm-project-8723 #cycloneAmphan

Sorry it's:
#hotosm-project-9463 #covid19 #COVGuy

Thank you for the note!

Do you know the region? I ask because - when I saw them in the satellite images I pondered what kind of basins they are Actually? Only curious about it. ;-)

There seems to be filled and unfilled ones so they are probably managed? Is this for some kind of aquaculture - there are so many?

(Which was the reason why i mapped these basins as basins... -because i don't know- in the first place.)