i will not revert at all , but to remove your ridge line at once

https://ibb.co/C0bnc0M
see what are you doing, why don't you leave all nodes alone? you are the one who should correct all nodes to expect GPS location, if you don't, why does you insist at the first place? Can't you see the 3D model already show detail ridges?

what an earth are you people?
im sorry my english is not well, let see the JPG at first place, https://ibb.co/C0bnc0M
you were attached all the nodes into your ridge line, then, they were misplaced and some are out of foot path, what are you doing?

please alway use "hide" to avoid the attached things

just take a look CyclOSM you will have the satelite 3D model which fully better than yours graffiti, you asking me what i have done to your changeset, im asking the same!

i will suggest you alway to contribe the very correct information which is not a parallel & nearby things. and please not to merge nodes to make it hard to remove, its annoying as i say

saddly, not everyone wanted to waste time to wipe your "contribution"

the one you should release all the nodes and correct them to the right place, and then remove all straight ridge representation, the ridge is the path itself, mostly

and please stop this madness on the map at HK, your straight line are very visible, affecting all hiker who using OSM in HK including HKer, you are abusing by using 3rd party hack tools to revert as i know

i will revert all your graffiti asap

stop your graffiti, pointless, incomplete, what all the straight line work for?

your drawing were just low grade and useless, and merged with whole nodes with the wrong gps location

多謝你提醒, 前日加入分支線路時, 發現此支路偏移, 修正後才能順利完成, 因我看Bing實景圖作對比, 不知道是否高架橋樑, 拜託請你幫忙修正, 抱歉抱歉.

if there have measuring cylinder, i do agree with you, but somehow the peak is now showing on top of the carpark, building, bridge, trail, road etc..

Im thank you all of you to provide them to us, they are valuable , but strongly recommend you to give it a name such as TV-11? that make more sense and easy to read, easy to read is more important as you see, this map is not a technical map, not this layer.

sorry guy my english is not well, all my words is no offend, i believe we are welcome to via osm information to know where the hill location and name, but must not a hundred peak symbol on one trail. if you dont have the better way or the system have no way to handle elevation, pls do not create them.

i can say they are all invalid and confusing peoples, as you see they are surrounding on the map, they are using PEAK symbol but they are not, i know they are telling the elevation, but this is too much PEAK symbol on the map, you should review on your point.

yup, they maybe valid data, but as you see, the whole map was surrounded tag showing how height they are, i told you this is unnecessary to show it on the all trails inch by inch